The current state of political development in Taiwan greatly saddens and angers me. As my closest friend, a Taiwanese, also shares the same passion of Asian politics, I find myself deeply immersed in Taiwan's recent political turmoil.
As a foreigner, I also believe that I am probably in the best position to comment and express my sentiments towards the recent "Depose A-bian" campaign with a uniquely outside view.
I do not deny the fact that I feel emotional inclined toward President Chen Shui-bian (
It is a fact that since the 2000 presidential elections, the world has started to notice Taiwan for the various developments it has made in industries like tourism, electronic engineering and entertainment. This brings both hopes and fears to Taiwanese.
With a gradual deregulation of the media, Taiwan's TV shows and tourism industry have reaped the benefits. With record numbers of tourists flocking to Taiwan and the high quality and quantity of media and entertainment programs available to the world. This has proved to be a catalyst in benefitting Taiwan's economy. This has given hope to the common Taiwanese.
But the constant conflicts between rival political parties and on cross-strait issues has drawn skepticism in both investment and business, resulting in a faltering economy and an under-performing government.
With the seemingly never ending political conflict, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (
This campaign talks of being an unbiased movement against the president for his family's involvement in recent financial scandals. Shih's agenda may be groundless. However, without concrete and definite answers, it lacks credibility.
He is riding on the skepticism and worries of many Taiwanese about the lack of economic and social improvement. These sentiments and their influence are increased by the what I can only describe as the local media, which believes "negative coverage equals higher viewer and readership."
I am not in a position to judge whether the president should resign or be deposed based on the evidence and allegations currently available. However, if one cannot trust and believe in the legitimacy of law and justice, how do we expect rights and wrong to be justified? How do we prevail in the era of uncertainty?
Ron Wu
Singapore
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath