Tanks on the streets, television stations going off the air and generals claiming to have seized power were events that many thought had been consigned to history in Thailand. Or so most of the country thought until Tuesday.
For, despite the political crisis that has engulfed the country over the last nine months, no one predicted the impasse created by opposition to Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra's alleged corruption and abuse of power would end with anything other than a democratic outcome.
A general election was expected in November to clear the air polluted by a flawed poll in April. That election had followed nine months of demonstrations, counter-demonstrations, lawsuits and counter-lawsuits.
Leaders on both sides of Thailand's political divide had been preaching peace and vowing not to resort to violence or extra-constitutional tactics.
Military commanders insisted they and their troops would stay out of politics.
It is still too early to explain exactly what precipitated the dramatic turn of events in Bangkok on Tuesday, which revived memories of the last coup in 1991. But over the last few weeks there have been signs of the military's growing frustration with Thaksin.
Thaksin, a former police colonel, for years has been trying to flood the top ranks of the armed forces and police with relatives and friends. For example, one of his cousins, General Chaiyasith Shinawatra, was army commander until August last year.
He was replaced by General Sondhi Boonyaratkalin, who quickly demonstrated he was anything but a Thaksin acolyte. A few weeks ago, Sondhi publicly lambasted Thaksin's uncompromising approach to solving the insurgency in the three predominantly Muslim southern provinces that has left more than 1,700 people dead since January 2004.
Four bombs last weekend in the tourist city of Hat Yai, north of the violence-ravaged provinces, indicated the trouble was spreading, while a significant escalation in attacks since June in the three provinces had spurred no change in government policy.
On Aug. 24, a car was discovered packed with 80kg of explosives outside Thaksin's home. He immediately branded it an assassination attempt and blamed people in the military. The evidence collected was not definitive and senior officers were rounded up without investigators producing much in the way of answers.
The spat between Sondhi and Thaksin centered on the latest reshuffling of the military. As in the past, Thaksin wanted to promote his buddies into key positions. As of Tuesday, the list had yet to be approved.
But there are deeper issues and forces at work. The yellow ribbons the soldiers in the streets tied to their guns and tanks provide a clear demonstration of where their loyalty lies -- namely to deeply revered King Bhumibol Adulyadej and not to any politician.
One of the undercurrents to the months of turmoil has been the king's unspoken but obvious dissatisfaction with Thaksin, analysts say. It is this that partly triggered the troops' move.
"The forces loyal to Sondhi have acted in defense of the king and taken Thaksin to task for his perceived illegitimacy," said Titinan Pongsudhirak, a political analyst at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok.
Since he took office in 2001, Thaksin has steadily eroded the independence of institutions that were meant to act as checks and balances on executive authority. The most notable example is how he flooded the senate with his loyalists and thus got his supporters appointed to bodies such as the elections commission and the constitutional court.
Corruption allegations came to the fore in January when Thaksin's close relatives sold their shares in the family-controlled Shin Corp for more than ?1 billion without paying any tax.
It massively boosted the popularity of the People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) movement, which had been holding small but vociferous protests against the prime minister. The PAD cranked up its demonstrations into almost daily events and the three main opposition parties boycotted an April election Thaksin called to let the people decide his fate.
Thaksin's support base of the mainly rural poor held up fairly well, but under Thailand's complex electoral rules the boycott meant not all seats could be filled and so parliament could not sit.
The limbo continued until the king intervened and ordered the courts to resolve the matter, which they did by annulling the election in April.
Thaksin's perceived perfidy re-emerged when he said he would step down as leader but within days was clearly back in charge. Fears have mounted that Thaksin was considering desperate measures as his position grew increasingly bleak.
Rumors were spreading that Thaksin would launch a crackdown on a new series of PAD rallies scheduled to begin on Wednesday, which in turn triggered speculation that the opposition might resort to violence.
Sondhi's forces now appear to be in control, but their grip on power is uncertain until the Thaksin loyalists in the military show their hand.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath