In terms of population and size, Brazil is 8.3 times and 240 times bigger than Taiwan respectively, while population density is only one-twenty-ninth of Taiwan's.
With regard to natural resources, size and population, there is a wide discrepancy between Taiwan and Brazil. However, both countries have fared about the same in terms of economic development and growth rates. In the 1970s, 90 percent of Brazil's crude oil was imported, while Taiwan today imports nearly 100 percent of its oil.
The reason Brazil has attracted the world's attention in recent years is that while the world is concerned about soaring oil prices and the worsening greenhouse effect, Brazil is now self-sufficient in terms of fuel supply and it has replaced 40 percent of its gasoline consumption with biomass energy -- ethanol.
During the 1970s oil crisis, the Brazilian government realized that its heavy dependence on oil imports would threaten its energy security, so it began to put great effort into exploring and exploiting domestic oil fields and pursuing a pioneering energy substitution project to replace gasoline with ethanol.
Not only that, it sought to reward farmers who were willing to grow sugar cane, while also establishing research institutes to improve sugar cane varieties and ethanol brewing procedures.
In Brazil today, a liter of ethanol is around NT$18 and a liter of gasoline costs NT$33. Although a liter of ethanol contains about 30 percent less energy than gasoline, it is still an economic fuel.
Most Brazilian gas stations offer three types of fuel: pure ethanol, a mix of gasoline and ethanol, and premium gasoline. The mix previously contained 25 percent ethanol, but that was reduced to 20 percent as the demand for ethanol outstriped supply. It is estimated that by the end of this year, all vehicles sold in Brazil will be powered by both ethanol and gasoline.
Brazil's ethanol program has not been hassle-free. In the 1980s, when the world's oil prices were falling, sugar cane farmers and owners of ethanol-powered vehicles suffered tremendous losses. Nevertheless, the government never gave up on its ambitious project. Fortunately, its perseverance and hard work has now paid off.
Nowadays, energy experts and entrepreneurs from developed countries travel to Brazil to learn from its success. I believe that leaders of Taiwan's energy companies and government policymakers should follow Brazil's example.
Using ethanol is not the only approach to solving energy shortages and the greenhouse effect. Therefore, carmakers and research institutes are developing electric cars that use hydrogen batteries that transform ethanol energy into electricity or use standard power supplies. The latter requires light and large capacity batteries. Ethanol production does not rely on sugar cane alone.
Considering the environmental impact, Taiwan is planning to use sweet potatoes rather than sugar cane to generate the energy the country needs, while the US is considering the use of corn. Many countries are also developing technology aiming to produce ethanol from plant fiber.
If the project is feasible, sugar cane bagasse, grass, discarded wood and scrap paper could also be used. Promoting biomass power in Taiwan could also reduce unemployment and enhance the nation's energy security.
Another issue to consider is that if a scarcely populated country such as Brazil has experienced inadequate yields of these energy substitutes, Taiwan is likely to encounter similar problems. Some energy experts even predict that if all land not used to produce food is used to produce biomass energy, that would still only cover 30 percent of world's energy needs, and it would affect global food production.
For example, Brazil's massive use of ethanol has led to soaring international cane sugar prices. As the global population continues to grow, the potential impact of the use of biomass power on the world's food supply must be considered.
There is no such thing as a free lunch. The rate at which natural resources regenerate is limited. When natural resources are consumed for one purpose, that means that there are less resources left for other purposes. The important thing is that energy policy is environmentally friendly and that sustainable development is the guiding principle.
If we want to continue to have fish, we cannot fish for both large and small fish, and if we want to continue have rice and sweet potato, we cannot use all the stems, branches and leaves to produce ethanol. The best policy for sustainable development is still to save on the limited global resources.
Tsong Tien-tzou is a research fellow in the Institute of Physics at the Academia Sinica.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS