Representatives of religious groups and Taipei City councilors have attacked plans by the Taipei City Government's Department of Civil Affairs to fund this year's parade by the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) Civil Rights Movement.
Some have stated in public that tolerating homosexual behavior would cause "sanitary problems" and make Taipei a "breeding ground" for HIV/AIDS. They even consider homosexuality a sin that violates good morals and needs to be "corrected."
This blatant and openly homophobic discourse highlights the gravity of discrimination in Taiwan and how urgent it is that this discrimination is dealt with. The most pressing task for civil rights groups, civic organizations and all levels of government right now is to promote an anti-discrimination law to combat mainstream social prejudice and ensure basic civil rights for disadvantaged and non-mainstream groups.
The criticism leveled by religious groups is based on several rational and scientific fallacies. Homosexual orientation is not something that can be "corrected," homosexuality is not the primary source of HIV/AIDS, nor will legalizing same-sex marriage lead to the extinction of the entire human race, since same-sex marriage will not "correct" the sexual orientation of heterosexuals and turn them into homosexuals. The deeper issue is the relationship between values and power.
Regardless of whether homosexuality or any other non-mainstream sexual orientation is genetically determined or voluntarily chosen, why should the state or society try to "correct" these orientations? Even if same-sex marriage were to be legalized in Taiwan, would this inconvenience heterosexuals in any direct way?
In a secular, pluralistic society in which church and state are separated, sexual orientation is a matter of individual choice and practice.
As long as it doesn't interfere with the lives of other people, being either homosexual or heterosexual is part of our fundamental freedoms.
Unfortunately, the protectors of heterosexual dominance cannot tolerate the appearance of new and diverse social values, and they use public resources to suppress and discriminate against those who differ from them.
This merging of superior power with mainstream values and the rejection of the other is the essence of discrimination.
Taiwan has not experienced the frenzied student and civil rights movements that occurred in western Europe and the US during the 1960s. This is one reason why Taiwanese lack a sense of awareness and the ability to reflect on the issue of discrimination -- they seem to think that it is the natural order of things to bully the weak and let the majority steam-roller all over the minority.
In addition to the hateful anti-gay rhetoric of religious leaders and politicians, other examples of how Taiwanese society believes in the law of the jungle and that might makes right include the selective approach police officers apply to home parties organized by homosexuals, politicians' contemptuous comments about female immigrants from Southeast Asia and China, and the hostile attitudes in residential communities toward people with HIV/AIDS or those with physical or mental problems moving into their community.
In dealing with the problem of discrimination, the government should not organize activities or offer benefits out of pity or as if it were acting out of charity. Rather, it should actively work to correct such malign social prejudice and prevent discrimination and prejudice from festering in public life.
Although the city government, for example, has sponsored activities which have achieved good results and international visibility, it has no concrete and effective anti-discrimination regulations to guarantee that marginalized groups -- including homosexuals -- do not suffer discrimination and oppression.
The Taipei City Government's current draft self-governance ordinance for the protection of human rights (
This conciliatory way of "placating the weak, but not correcting the mainstream" is still very far from respect for human rights.
Taipei being the capital city of Taiwan, the government should immediately take the following steps:
First, the government should clearly declare a firm stance in this "cultural war." It should not be allowed to vilify a homosexual orientation and lifestyle, and the government should continue to support similar activities based on the spirit of preserving cultural diversity.
Second, it should formally respond to religious groups. Any government agency canceling or withdrawing sponsorship for LGBT activities for religious reasons may be in violation of the principle of separating church and state, which is ensured by the Constitution.
Third, as the basic law on human rights (
Bruce Liao is an assistant professor of law at Soochow University and an adviser to the Taipei City Government's Human Rights Protection Committee.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS