When Thomas Friedman -- the US journalist who has become globalization's loudest cheerleader -- wanted to illustrate the powerful forces at work in the world economy, he got on a flight for Bentonville, Arkansas, headquarters of the glory that is Wal-Mart.
In his hagiographic best-seller, The World Is Flat, Friedman records his awe while standing in the middle of Wal-Mart's operation center in Bentonville, watching the movement of goods at the heart of the world's largest retailer, which last year recorded more than US$300 billion in sales from 6,600 stores in 15 countries, including the Asda chain in Britain.
"Call it the `Wal-Mart Symphony' in multiple movements -- with no finale," Friedman wrote in his trademark breathless prose.
"It just plays over and over 24/7/365: delivery, sorting, packing distribution, buying, manufacturing, reordering, delivery, sorting, packing," he wrote.
Friedman was so impressed that he named Wal-Mart as one of the biggest forces driving globalization, saying: "It's role as one of the 10 forces that flattened the world is undeniable."
But recent history has not been kind to Friedman. As the leading foreign affairs columnist for the New York Times, he was an influential voice in the ear of east-coast liberals, supporting the neoconservative arguments in favor of the invasion of Iraq and the toppling of Saddam Hussein.
Recently, as Iraq's descent into bloody civil war has made a mockery of cruise-missile liberals, he has had the sense to recant. But Friedman's pin-ups for globalization haven't fared so well either. The computer manufacturer Dell, lauded to the skies in The World Is Flat, belatedly found that its laptops included a built-in cigarette-lighter feature when their batteries began bursting into flames.
Now it is Wal-Mart's turn to suffer the curse of Friedman. Since his book was published it seems that little has gone right for the champion of globalization
In recent months the giant retailer -- at the start of this year the world's second largest corporation by revenue after Exxon Mobil -- has suffered a string of defeats. Some have been self- inflicted, but others are a sign that Wal-Mart's attempts to export its formula of massive purchasing power and cheap imports from China, combined with stringent cost-cutting and aggressive anti-unionism, are beginning to fail.
The first sign that Friedman's steamroller of globalization was stalling came in May, when the company announced it was pulling out of South Korea. South Korea was one of the first countries Wal-Mart moved into outside North America. But its all-American model of piling very high and selling very cheap never appealed to consumers there.
"It failed to read what South Korean housewives want when they go shopping," a local analyst told the New York Times.
Last month, the company announced it was also withdrawing from Germany and selling its 85 stores there, despite pouring in hundreds of millions of dollars over the years to compete with local chains such as Aldi.
German customers were turned off by the enforced friendliness of its employees, while the employees objected to US imports such as chanting at morning staff meetings: "Who's number one? The customer."
In the UK, Wal-Mart has also run into trouble with its Asda subsidiary, which it bought in 1999 and now has more than 300 stores and 160,000 employees. Last month the threat of a strike by the GMB general union led the company to make unusually significant concessions, agreeing to allow the union access to Asda depots and to participate in a process leading to collective bargaining.
Not long afterward it was revealed by the All-China Federation of Trade Unions that Wal- Mart had allowed 19 unions to be set up in its stores there.
The Asda and China results marked a clear victory for organized labor against the giant of globalization. Previously Wal-Mart's determination to run union-free shops was such that when workers at a branch in the Canadian city of Jonquiere -- a bastion of the fierce labor movement in Quebec -- took measures to unionize, the company permanently closed the store. Wal-Mart claims it shuttered the store because of poor turnover, but the closure sent a clear message that Wal-Mart could press the nuclear button.
The softening line against unions comes as Wal-Mart's bottom line has suffered.
Last week the company announced its first decline in net profits in 10 years, thanks to weak sales in the US and UK and the cost of cutting its losses in Germany.
The faltering sales in the US come as shoppers, hit by higher gas prices, appear less willing to drive long distances to one of Wal-Mart's monster outlets.
Opponents are showing their displeasure by other means than voting with their feet. The documentary movie Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price highlighted the company's less savory practices.
Byron Dorgan -- a US senator from the Democratic Party who would be a contender for the presidential nomination if he were from a larger state than North Dakota -- has taken aim at Wal-Mart and its allies in a new book, Take This Job And Ship It, arguing that the company's mega-stores destroy communities.
Earlier this month, former presidential candidate John Kerry pointed out that five of the 10 richest people in US were from the family of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton, yet the company still fails to provide proper health care for its workers.
Faced with attacks from moderate US politicians such as Dorgan and Kerry, state and city-level attempts to force companies like Wal-Mart to adhere to basic levels of pay and health insurance and local hostility to new stores, the company's share price continues to suffer.
Naturally, the company has been fighting back from a war-room in its Bentonville headquarters that Friedman certainly never visited.
Its efforts include the establishment of a lobbying group called Working Families for Wal-Mart, spending millions of dollars in donations to politicians, and sending "voter guides" to its staff.
Despite its recent setbacks, Wal-Mart is not about to give up. Its international expansion will continue -- at the end of last year it invested in Brazil, Japan and Central America. And it remains hugely powerful in the US, where polls show that of those who shop at least once a week in the company's outlets, 78 percent voted for US President George W. Bush in 2004.
But outside the US, Wal-Mart's formula may be mirroring US foreign policy: brash, bold and unpopular. Unfortunately for Friedman, the rest of the world may not want to be flattened.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath