The ongoing political strife may have caused many people to overlook other important issues concerning Taiwan's future. One of the most urgent and important things going on currently is a major market realignment of the local cable TV industry. The process has been fraught with open conflict, veiled attacks and complexity. It has also exposed a host of serious problems.
Eastern Multimedia Co (EMC,
According to in-depth studies carried out by our party over the last two years, a reasonable cable TV subscription fee should not exceed NT$250 per month per household, since that would give operators a reasonable profit, rather than the current NT$600 prescribed by the Government Information Office (GIO). Excessive subscription fees are the root cause of the problem, and when local governments were deliberating on cable TV subscription fees earlier this year, the result was that the GIO and local governments agreed to a monthly subscription fee of around NT$250.
We don't have to rely on clever accountants to understand that foreign investors have paid sky-high prices for controlling stakes in EMC and China Network Systems Co (CNS, 中嘉網路). In recent years, customers have had to fork out between NT$500 and NT$600 per month for local cable TV services. Leaving aside the issues of service, quality and content, the NT$42,000 per subscriber these foreign companies paid amounts to seven years of subscription fees per household. That is, even if these foreign investors do not spend a dollar, it will still take them seven years to get their initial investment back.
Foreign investors of course have made detailed calculations. They are not willing to sustain long term losses to "aid" Taiwan's consumers. Most importantly, there are many hidden benefits and even chances to earn exorbitant profits that outsiders are unaware of, and this is the reason for this outcome.
Cable TV operators claim that current subscription fees are too low, when the fact is that they have earned back their initial investment and continued to run these firms without investing in technology or hardware. After having earned their fill, they treat their customers like pigs at an auction and sell them off to the highest foreign bidder and allow them to exploit Taiwan's consumers further.
Having seen deal after deal involving staggering amounts of money, I have come to realize how clever these businesspeople are. Many people believe that times are hard, it never occurred to them that their cable TV operators could rake in between NT$40,000 and NT$50,000 per subscriber.
In fact, the problem relating to the cable TV industry results from the erroneous policies of the former KMT government. By letting local big business monopolize the industry, a public utility, at least the money stayed in Taiwan. But now, foreign investors have taken over, gaining a monopoly over Taiwan's cultural independence and choice and the opportunity to practice cultural imperialism. The time is now ripe for the DPP government to give full play to transitional justice and turn the tables on the unjust operations of cable TV firms.
Tien Chiu-chin is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath