Former Democratic Progres-sive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh's (施明德) campaign to force President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to step down might be praiseworthy if it enables Shih to put a stop to the squabbling between the pan-blue and pan-green camps and create a space for the rise of a third force.
Developments over the past few days, however, show no signs of moving in this direction. On the contrary, we see Shih unwittingly becoming trapped in the confrontation between the two camps, and worse, becoming part of the pan-blue anti-Chen forces of the past six years.
The most obvious signs of this are Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
Looking at these events, it's easy to conclude that most of the members of the public who signed Shih's petition or donated NT$100 to his campaign are in fact pan-blue supporters. So it does not matter how many people send donations, as the pan-blues will continue to call on Chen to step down while the pan-greens will continue to support the president. Shih's campaign is thus not representative of a third force.
Since there does not seem to be much room for the development of a third force in the country, Shih will likely suffer the same fate as Hsu when the campaign is over -- that is, being booted out by the pan-blue camp as soon as he is no longer useful.
To survive, he will have to be "bluer" than the pan-blue camp, just like Hsu was when he abruptly decided to stage a solitary sit-in demonstration while the pan-blue camp was holding its own rallies following the presidential election on March 20, 2004. This could well be a picture of Shih's future.
Regardless of whether they are organized by pro-green activists, academics, the Democratic Action Alliance (
If traditional political activities cannot move past being an emotional protest against a specific individual, then involving a wider spectrum of participants will merely create a new kind of populist movement. It will neither transcend the urban elite nor create new ideological values, but only plant the seed for the next conflict.
This is true of traditional political conflict in Chinese society, as well as of the pan-blue camp's power struggles following the rule of former president and KMT chairman Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). If Shih is unable to transcend these historically imposed structural constraints, he is certainly unlikely to be able to use this campaign to further widen his appeal.
Wang Kun-yi is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath