Adrian Mitchell, playwright, author and "alternative poet laureate," arrived last week at a place he called the New Jerusalem -- a vast campsite in Kent, southeast England, where nearly 5,000 young people were spending 12 days teaching themselves about the environment, democracy, peace, justice and how to change the world.
It was the Woodcraft Folk's five-yearly mega-gathering, organized by kids for kids, during which the Kent county showground near Maidstone was turned into a Global Village fit for democratic, or even anarchistic, angels. In one vast tent behind Mitchell, a youth parliament had been convening; in another, a former child soldier from Sierra Leone was leading a rap session; down the track, the Fairy Trade Cafe and the Politically Active Revolutionary Thinking Youth center drew custom from the 41 tented "villages" into which the teenagers and students from more than 50 countries had been billeted.
Mitchell's contribution to the event was a new play, The Fear Machine, designed for about 50 actors and a chorus of 2,000.
"They challenged me to deliver one for 5,000 people, and they listed 10 things that needed to be done to change the world," he told me. "I slept on it."
Much like the way the Woodcraft Folk themselves seem to operate, he came up with something on a grand scale. A runaway girl, a dog and a mystery tramp meet and decide to put out people's fears. So they build a monstrous "Fear Engine" that goes round the world extinguishing political and personal fears.
"It gets pretty heavy, but it has a very hopeful ending," Mitchell said.
The "Woodies," as they are known, range in age from eight to 24, and their monster camps mix the spirit of Glastonbury, the handwringing and concerns of the UN, and the passion of the playground. Thirty years ago, this youth movement, set up in 1925 as an alternative to the Scouts, was mostly strong in northern England, but these days their educational methods of encouraging youths to explore for themselves morality and world affairs has become international. The numbers of teenagers attracted to their gatherings is said to be rocketing.
The reason, said people at the camp, was the deteriorating wider political and environmental landscape, and concern for global issues.
"We too want our voices to be heard," said student Zoe Waterman. "Teenagers want to change things and to contribute. It's a lot to do with the global political dynamic. The Iraq war woke up so many people."
This year, the Woodies' camp cost nearly ?1 million (US$ 1.8 million) and the UK's Department for International Development contributed ?150,000. The British were joined by 300 Germans, a large contingent from Latin America, and others from political hotspots such as Bhutan, Western Sahara, South Africa, Palestine and Kurdistan. The collective theme was the UN's eight millennium development goals, around which they organized workshops and high-quality informed debates.
"Talking directly to political refugees, hearing stories from Africa and the Middle East, and finding out what is going on in Brazil or Venezuela makes you see the world differently," said Robert Jones, 15. "I just did not imagine anything so interesting."
But, this being the Woodies, they added extra UN goals, which they decided that the world leaders had missed out. So beyond exploring ways to eradicate world poverty, end debt, provide water and sanitation and make poverty history, they tried to instil "peace" and to demand fair trade and cooperation.
If that sounds PC and dull to adults, the Kent campers said it was essential learning for future citizenship.
"It's about looking forward, and saying what we have is not working," said Lloyd Russell-Moyle, a student at Bradford University's Department of Peace Studies.
Along with the Scottish sustainable energy caravan, where people could get their mobiles charged and hot water via a photovoltaic system, one of the most popular venues was the court set up in the self-styled Democracy Center. There, every day, trials were held of fictional people and companies, with fierce defenses and prosecutions being made before a judge and jury. In one, a newspaper editor was accused of publishing a homophobic article, and in another an Indian drug company was accused of illegally making HIV/AIDS drugs.
"It was very heated indeed," said the [elected] judge, Ruth Yates, who plans to be a doctor. "We tried the editor several times with different juries, but he was always found guilty. I could not imprison him, so I fired him."
Between the games, the role-playing, the debates and the theater of 5,000 kids trying to run their own world, there was plenty of reality. A gale shredded some of the tents; the truck meant to empty the lavatories did not turn up; the chess set used to play "democratic" chess went missing; and there were very long lines in the girls' showers. Moreover, two Scandinavian campers had carried out a survey of 500 people and estimated that 30 percent of people at the camp smoked.
"It is much more than we expected," said one in the daily newspaper, Global Voice.
Wafa Othman, of Ramallah, in Palestine, said: "It is very beautiful here. It feels like the world is small. People ask us what is life like for us. So I tell them. But they do not really understand how bad it is. Some think we are from Pakistan. Not everyone knows where Palestine is. I hope we can tell them more."
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS