Some people believe that being separated by an ocean leaves peoples far apart. For Canada and Taiwan, the ocean happens to bring us closer together.
The world's oceans, and the fish that live within them, are matters of key concern for both Canada and Taiwan. Taiwan has one of the world's largest tuna fishing fleets, and Canada's fishing industry has long been a staple for the economies of our coastal communities.
Unfortunately, the oceans and high seas fisheries that have provided us with so much have not always been cared for properly in return. Today, many fish stocks around the world are either fully exploited or overexploited. If we want future generations to benefit from this resource, we have a duty to stop overfishing and care for the ecosystems that sustain these fish.
Most countries face similar problems in trying to end over-fishing. These include addressing overcapacity in fishing fleets, and preventing illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. It is only natural for us to learn from one another and find ways to work in unison to meet common goals. To achieve our goals, we need to work together and deliver concrete results.
Last month, Canada was pleased to take part in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Fisheries Working Group and an associated workshop held in Kaohsiung. The title of this workshop was, appropriately enough, "Sharing Experience in Managing Fishing Capacity."
The subsequent working group meeting in Kaohsiung provided an opportunity for participants to move further toward the goal of ending overfishing. It also allowed us to build on the Bali Plan of Action developed during the 2nd APEC ocean-related ministerial meeting held in Bali, Indonesia, last September.
The Bali plan outlines priorities for action in three key areas: balancing conservation and sustainable use; providing for sustainable economic benefits from the oceans; and enabling sustainable development of coastal communities.
This action plan is international in scope and requires a combination of local, regional and global efforts to see it succeed. The role of regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) is key.
The international community is increasingly frustrated by continued overfishing and the resulting depletion of fish stocks, which is occurring, in part, under the watch of RFMOs. Fishing entities around the world must work more effectively through RFMOs to sustainably manage fisheries on the high seas. Canada and Taiwan, for instance, share a responsibility for strengthening and following the fisheries management rules established by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) and the Western and Central Pacific Tuna Commission when fishing our tuna quotas.
As a result of decisions taken by ICCAT at last year's annual meeting, the Taiwanese fishing fleet has had to make some significant adjustments. Canada, which has had to undertake its own painful adjustments, and other countries are fully aware of the efforts that the Taiwanese government and fishing industry are making to reduce its fleet size and fishing effort, and to ensure that Taiwanese vessels do not engage in illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing activities. We are encouraged by these efforts and the growing awareness of fishing stakeholders around the world that the international rules for high seas fisheries must be respected.
The need for international co-operation in sustainably managing global fisheries and ensuring healthy oceans ecosystems is as pressing as ever. The ocean that lies between us is not a barrier for inaction; it is a source for collaboration and shared interests.
Gordon Houlden is the executive director of the Canadian Trade Office in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath