The Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development came to a close last week, and it remains difficult to reach a consensus on cross-strait economic and trade policy. Since the cross-strait relationship is a political issue, cross-strait investment and trade policy is unlikely to be separated from political considerations and focus solely on economic issues. Taiwan is a democracy with a free economy. It can open itself up to the world, but can never fully do so toward China.
China is responsible for this state of affairs because of its longstanding threats and the 800-odd ballistic missiles it has aimed at Taiwan.
Recently a Hong Kong media outlet said that 14 Chinese enterprises have been placed on a Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry blacklist. Taiwan cannot ignore this fact.
If Taiwan refuses to relax trade and investment restrictions on China, it is sure to come under pressure from Taiwanese businesspeople and foreign investors. Businesspeople don't care about hatred between nations; they only want to make money.
When multinational corporations pressure their governments to open up to China, it is little wonder the latter don't feel sympathetic toward Taiwan. Firms in Japan and the US often complain that there are no direct cross-strait transportation links.
It is true that the lack of direct cross-strait transport causes some commercial inconvenience, but what has really prompted interest in direct links from Japan and the US is cheap operating costs in China.
Capital is indispensable to a nation's economic development. The reason China has grown faster than other communist nations is not because Beijing has a genius for pursuing economic development, but because it has the advantage of Taiwan and Hong Kong, which provide China with capital, technology and management know-how.
Taiwan's China-bound investment accounts for around a quarter of China's inbound foreign investment. Taiwan is losing so much to China that its development has been affected. This includes people of fugitive tycoon Chen Yu-hao's (
The most pressing issue facing Taiwan is that the government must implement the "active management" policy for China-bound investment while formulating a strategy to attract foreign investment. At the same time that Taiwan defends itself, it should also go on the attack.
Taiwan's financial sector still trails far behind Hong Kong's. With Hong Kong's freedom and legal system eroding following its return to China in 1997, Taiwan should take advantage of this by focusing on two issues.
First, it should further open its economy and get rid of unnecessary restrictions. The government should provide the best possible services to business travelers and attract investment, particularly from China's non-governmental sector.
Second, the government should revise regulations governing the financial sector. As it is difficult to check the operations of Taiwanese firms in China, the government should not consider allowing them to go public in Taiwan. However, since China is restricting foreign capital from investing in property, Taiwan should try to attract these foreign (including Chinese) investors.
The government should do all it can to improve the investment environment. For instance, it should try to reduce labor costs by placing restrictions on brokers for foreign labor.
It should also work to benefit the general public by rooting out corrupt practices and avoiding manipulation by special interests hostile to Taiwanese self-determination.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath