The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) national congress passed a motion to dissolve the party's factions to thunderous applause.
But the effort was wasted, because shortly after the motion was passed at around 2pm on July 23, the factions were resurrected in the Central Standing Committee election.
Except for Vice President Annette Lu (
As a mediator between the nation and public, a political party in a democracy has two major functions. First, it must recommend political and legislative talent to all levels of government, including directly elected government heads, representatives and administrative officials. Second, it must compile public opinion to form policies and laws to run the nation.
Within a party, factions play the role of mediator between the party's headquarters and its members. They help to select party and public officials, and collect opinions from members.
Outside of politics, even civil organizations have factions. Without a board of directors supported by factions, the head of an organization would be hard-pressed to pass any administrative measures. Still, unity among such factions is much looser, because civil organizations do not exercise power at the national level.
The general public and the government have no way to link without parties, and different parties have arisen to reflect the diversity of public opinion. Similarly, the diverse memberships of parties and organizations means they split into factions.
But although all parties have factions, their operations may differ. The factions of more conservative parties tend to pay less attention to ideals and instead focus on winning public posts. The factions of revolutionary or reformist parties, however, often give more weight to ideals and party direction, and tend to launch more reforms. This is the situation abroad as well as within the DPP.
Without the maneuvering of factions, the DPP may not have passed such measures as its "Resolution on Taiwan's Future," its pro-Taiwan independence platform and the "mass line," as they may have been considered too radical at a time when the party was focused on winning official positions. Without the support of the factions, it is possible that the party's pro-Taiwan independence platform would have been removed under the leadership of President Chen Shui-bian (
The DPP's decision to dissolve its factions was useless, because the key to weakening them lies instead in reforming the party at a fundamental level. Using the US as an example, the party leadership must be further weakened, the Central Standing Committee must be abolished, party leaders must not interfere with national policies, the party chair should only be an election campaign manager or a general affairs director, and nominations for official posts should be based entirely on public primaries. Even with all this, factions are likely to persist, as so-called "party bosses" still exist in the US.
The dissolution of factions, just like the halving of the number of legislative seats, was simply a populist move. The only consolation is that the former will be much less harmful than the latter.
Lin Cho-shui is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath