Recently a group of pro-green academics launched a signature drive demanding President Chen Shui-bian's (
The unambiguous truth of the matter is that what truly threatens Taiwan's democracy is not the corruption scandals surrounding the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which also occur in many other countries and should simply be dealt with in accordance with the law. Rather, the danger is from a scheme orchestrated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to dissolve the pan-green camp and foment chaos in Taiwan in order to destroy the democratic regime led by the DPP.
Democracy means that people have the right to choose. Today, China is using its missiles to prevent the Taiwanese people from choosing their national title, flag and anthem. The KMT uses its massive party assets, the media advantage remaining from the KMT-led dictatorship and its camp's majority in the legislature to do exactly what the CCP is doing -- which is making sure that Taiwan doesn't change its national title or write a new Constitution.
A true idealist works for the public's right to free choice and protects the rule of law and democratic procedure. A true idealist does not take advantage of a political storm to vent his or her individual anger over unevenly divided political spoils.
Over the past few years, the KMT and the People First Party (PFP) have taken it on themselves to decide that the assassination attempt against Chen and Vice President Annette Lu (
Using a signature drive to express a political opinion is acceptable, but these so-called academics are asking that a democratically elected president step down. This reveals a lack of basic political common sense.
Not only that, their behavior also runs counter to the norms of democratic nations. In fact, this pretentious signature drive is taking place on the Internet, so there is no way to verify how many people have actually joined. Isn't it preposterous to think that a popularly elected president would step down as a result of such a signature drive? What is the fundamental difference between these academics, who have launched a public campaign to oust the president, and the pan-blue camp -- which tried and failed to recall the president?
Some of those who initiated the signature drive opposed the KMT in the past, but that does not mean that they truly understand democracy. After all, the CCP also opposed the KMT. Those who have been persecuted are not necessarily more right than those who once persecuted them. In his book The Farewell Party, Milan Kundera says that the saddest discovery of his life was that those who have been persecuted are no better than their persecutors, and that he could easily imagine them changing roles.
Cao Changqing is a freelance writer based in the US.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing