Kuwait has just held its 11th parliamentary election since independence in 1961. Though Kuwait is a monarchy, its parliamentary history has not been placid, and the election campaign reflected ongoing tensions between the royal family and segments of the electorate.
Originally scheduled for October 2007, the election was brought forward to break a deadlock between the parliament and the government over the number of electoral districts in the country. There are 25 constituencies nationwide, but reformers have long argued that a smaller number of voting districts -- each with a larger number of voters -- would be less susceptible to manipulation by the political elite.
The 29 members of parliament who support a reduced number of constituencies were unable to agree with the government on a new number. As a result, the issue became the focus of a vigorous campaign by discontented Kuwaitis, who gathered in front of the National Assembly building and in universities to voice their criticism.
In response, the government moved the redistricting issue from parliament to the constitutional court -- an attempt, reformers argued, to hold back change. When three members of parliament sought to question the prime minister -- their right, under the Kuwaiti Constitution -- the parliament was dissolved and elections called.
The rules of political life in Kuwait have been worked out over the 300 years since this small area emerged as a self-contained polity. The royal family is empowered to administer the country, but does so through consultation with different sectors, like tribal leaders or merchant groups.
When independence came in 1961, these rules were codified in a Constitution. Compared to other Gulf monarchies, the Kuwaiti royal family has limited powers, though constitutional rules have frequently been ignored -- charges of vote-rigging marred the 1967 election, and the parliament has been dissolved several times during the country's history.
Nevertheless, since Kuwait was liberated from Iraqi occupation in August 1990, the parliament has gained both stability and respect. The dissolutions of parliament in 1999 and this year were carried out according to the law, and elections were called in a timely fashion.
Parliament retains the right to interrogate Cabinet members, including the prime minister, on financial and administrative questions, and has frequently passed motions of no confidence in the government. More recently, with the death last December of Emir Sheikh Jabir al-Ahmad, parliamentary approval played a key role in resolving succession debates among factions of the royal family.
Overall, Kuwait has always had a lively political life, with more freedom of expression and less political repression than is common in neighboring countries. Political violence has been rare. Though political parties have not been legalized, they are nonetheless active in parliament and public life. Kuwaiti life reflects the many and varied political trends throughout the Arab world, and the country's open society and economic opportunities have made it a powerful magnet and regional safety valve since the 1950s.
In the last election, Kuwaiti women participated in choosing the parliament for the first time. Though women have long been active in Kuwaiti public life, they were enfranchised only last year, after a long and difficult campaign, when they gained suffrage by a parliamentary vote, though they accounted for just 28 of the 249 candidates.
Kuwait's voting population is 57 percent female, and local commentators speculated on the likely impact of women voters. Would they follow the voting patterns of their husbands? Clearly, women demonstrated tremendous enthusiasm for the political process, taking part in large numbers in political rallies, and as campaign workers in a range of election activities. In the end, while a loose opposition coalition of pro-reform former members of parliament, Islamists and liberals gained a majority of the National Assembly's 50 seats, no woman won.
The electorate focused almost entirely on the question of electoral districts. Most Kuwaitis see this very technical issue as a way of pressing for reform. Major regional issues, like the war in Iraq or Iran's nuclear program, were barely mentioned.
Islamist candidates were in an awkward position, seeking support from women voters -- whose participation they opposed. However, Islamists were among the 29 parliamentary deputies pushing for constituency reform, a fact that eased their dilemma. Support for reform comes from across the political spectrum, whereas opponents of reform paid a high price. Indeed, three members of the outgoing parliament who supported the government were not candidates, having lost in their tribal primaries.
With pro-reform forces strengthening their position in the new parliament, the government has two choices. It can go along with electoral reform, or it can find an opportunity to dissolve the new parliament. Commentators are already speculating on how long the new parliament will survive.
Whatever the immediate outcome, the Kuwaiti government is facing a new political horizon. Women are now the majority of voters, and young people have taken up the reform banner. Democracy will push the ruling family forward.
Ghanim al-Najjar is a professor of political science at Kuwait University. Copyight: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing