In an interview with the United Arab Emirates newspaper the Khaleej Times on Friday, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said he was considering the direction Taiwan will take after Tuesday's legislative recall vote.
Chen said he wants to hold domestic political talks and initiate cross-strait peace talks. While it is good to extend olive branches, the opposition and media remain unimpressed. This reaction should be a warning to Chen, and regardless of the outcome of the recall vote, he should review his leadership style.
Chen has talked about domestic political negotiations and cross-strait peace talks many times since his election in 2000. Over the six years since, he has met People First Party Chairman James Soong (
The meeting between Chen and Lien took place after Chen's 2000 inauguration. Although Lien said construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant should be handled cautiously, the Cabinet announced that construction would be halted almost before Lien had returned home from the meeting. To Lien, this was humiliating and he has never met Chen again.
The first of Chen's meetings with Soong, also in 2000, resulted in rumors that Soong would become premier. The second meeting took place early last year, with the conclusions of the meeting supposed to be the basis for negotiations when Soong took a message from Chen to Beijing. Not long after the meeting, however, Chen claimed Soong had met Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), head of China's Taiwan Affairs Office, in the US. The Chen-Soong relationship soured and Soong even took Chen to court over the matter. Although Soong's bid for Taipei mayor may be the main reason behind his insistence on the recall motion and a no confidence vote in the Cabinet, personal animosity between him and Chen is an important factor.
The meeting between KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Perhaps Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Chen's cross-strait policy has also constantly changed. With the cessation of the NUC, only "four noes" now remain of the "four noes, one without" policy proposed in his 2000 inaugural speech. He announced the "active opening, effective management" policy in 2001, and changed it to "active management, effective opening" this year. A lack of stability makes the public tend to take a wait-and-see attitude to cross-strait policy.
The recall proposed by the pan-blue camp may be unreasonable, but Chen must now review his leadership style and his handling of relations with the opposition, China and the world.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing