Recently there has been some talk about so-called "intelligent communities" around the globe -- with Taipei receiving top honors as "foremost intelligent community" from the New York-based Intelligent Community Forum ("Taipei honored with intelligent community prize," June 11, page 3).
But living in western Taiwan with all the beetle nut juice on the bloody ground (read putrid, bacteria-laden sputum), detritus and debris, flotsam and jetsam and air pollution and the elderly Japanese couple leaving Taiwan because of such dirty surroundings, I have some burning questions.
Why does Taiwan, or others, window-dress Taipei? It is like emulating Beijing and Shanghai. I hope not to see plastic bags being handed out to people to spit in. It would be like carrying a colostomy bag, but smaller, and worse, plastic spitting-bags would lend belief that the "spitter" was a normal person. When Cro-magnons roamed the earth, it was normal.
Model cities are something to behold, but thousands of their sisters slowly rotting. And it's not the cities that are rotting. It's the flora and fauna, and people.
But before I digress, "who are these fine members of the Intelligent Community Forum?" And second, by which or whose measuring stick (read "ethics") are they able to confer such pristine gifts upon major -- or not -- cities around the world?
My first guess is that they are either Raelians, or computer geeks. My second guess is that they are repentant, guilt-ridden, but disillusioned retired elites from the Exxon daze. And my third is that this conference is another feeble attempt by US President George W. Bush to put Taiwan on the map, or at least, a ketchup bottle.
However, please forgive my Raelian slight, for there just may be some benign, loving aliens out there who would really love to prune our trees, or at least teach us how to use biofriendly fuels, if not to whisk us away to some bushy, lush planet. But the real killer is, I don't understand how any entity can confer upon anyone or community an award that totally neglects the "E" word -- environment.
Everything based upon this forum's fantasy of the notion of "intelligence" is grounded in the fundamentally destructive fact of progress.
Kevin Larson
Chiayi
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath