The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday decided to place discussion of the presidential recall motion at the top of the agenda for the extraordinary legislative session that is scheduled to commence today. In the process leading up to this decision, KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (
Ma seems so weak, helpless and indecisive in the face of pressure from the radical factions both within his party and the pan-blue camp. One cannot help but wonder what kind of hope the KMT has of becoming a politically moderate and mainstream political party in the days to come.
When the scandals in which Chao Chien-ming (
So what happened? Almost overnight, Ma completely transformed himself -- warning that Chen would not come to a "good end" if he did not voluntarily step down, and whole-heartedly supporting the recall drive. He also backed the mobilization of already highly volatile pan-blue supporters for street rallies and demonstrations that could incite violent confrontations between ethnic groups and political camps.
Ma said his attitude changed because there was now evidence suggesting the president was involved in the scandals. However, the investigation into Chao's activities is reportedly near completion and prosecutors have found nothing so far to suggest Chen's involvement. If Ma knows something that the prosecutors do not, he has a duty to give that information to them. Nothing he has done so far suggests that he has taken such a step or even has such evidence.
It is far more likely that Ma's change of heart stems from his inability to control the hawkish and radical factions within his party.
It is no secret that there is a rivalry within the pan-blue camp between the KMT and the People First Party (PFP) for voters. The KMT has undergone several internal reshuffles in the past decade, leading to an exodus of the more conservative factions and the creation of the New Party and the PFP. Nevertheless, the power struggles between the radicals and the moderates and between the Taiwan consciousness supporters and adherents of the Greater China ideology continue to divide the KMT. The party, despite its financial difficulties, still has an abundance of resources and the power struggle is as much about control of those resources as it is about domestic political issues.
Ma's leadership faces the threat of being undermined by these internal battles. There is no way he can please everyone. In an effort to consolidate his leadership within not just the KMT but the entire pan-blue camp, however, Ma has apparently caved in to the pressure from the radical factions.
One cannot help but wonder what kind of vision Ma has for the KMT. If it is his hope to move his party toward the center of the political spectrum, he has to learn to say no to the hawks -- and fast.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath