Seventeen years after the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massa-cre, public events commemorating the incident are still banned in Beijing and the rest of China, a reflection of its appalling human rights situation. Some have called China's current human rights situation the result of the worst of socialism combined with the worst of capitalism.
China's abominable human rights conditions are entirely the result of the authorities' insistence on one-party autocratic rule. The Chinese leaders are also well aware that their authority is anchored in fear, and they know they must maintain this fear if they are to keep their grip on power.
Since coming to office, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) has demonstrated ruthlessness in cracking down on dissent with a view to extending the coercion and intimidation that Beijing has long employed, since before the Tiananmen Square Massacre. China hopes to crush any rebellion before it gets a chance to take hold, thereby avoiding the need for bloodshed.
There is no doubt that a staggering number of Chinese dissidents have been arrested, and this figure is likely the highest of any country in the world.
Since freedom of the press does not exist in China, there is no way the outside world will be able to obtain precise figures on the number of dissidents that have been arrested. The majority of statistics obtained by other countries are bound to fall far short of reality.
What are the prospects for China's human rights situation? Many have predicted that a succession crisis might emerge in China's top leadership, which would change the overall political scene in China. There are also many who believe that an economic crisis, particularly in the financial sector, is sure to take place in China, which would also lead to political changes. It seems safe to say that these two types of crises are highly likely.
There are also many who support the idea of economic determinism, believing that the deepening of economic reforms and the development of the middle class in China are bound to bring about freedom and democracy. The Tiananmen Square Massacre just goes to show that clinging to the idea that economic development will change things in China is little more than wishful thinking on the part of people with their heads firmly in the ground, ostrich style. The truth couldn't be more different. Given the present resilience of communist rule, China's dictatorship could remain for another two decades.
But if the Chinese Communist Party remains in power for another two decades, the future of the world, rather than that of the party, would be in jeopardy.
China is not the same as Cuba, and it is no North Korea. If the dictatorial regime in China reaches superpower status, it will certainly constitute a threat and bring disaster to the world. In this regard, China's human rights situation is an issue that concerns not only all Chinese, but the whole world. Only a few people around the world have realized this. It is of paramount importance that we make the whole world aware.
Hu Ping is the editor-in-chief of Beijing Spring, a US-based Chinese-language monthly magazine dedicated to the promotion of human rights, democracy and social justice in China.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS