Long story short, an influential member of Congress played the China card, and the State Department folded.
It was a drama that reached its conclusion late last week, when the State Department, responding to fears that its security might be breached by a secretly placed device or hidden software, agreed to keep personal computers made by Lenovo of China off its networks that handle classified government messages and documents.
The damage to Lenovo is more to its reputation than to its pocketbook. The State Department will use the 16,000 desktop computers it purchased from Lenovo, just not on the computer networks that carry sensitive government intelligence.
Yet the episode does point to how much relations between the US and China have become a tangled web of political, trade and security issues. Mutual economic dependence and mutual distrust, it seems, go hand in hand.
To the Lenovo side, the outcome was a matter of anti-China politics overriding economic logic.
Last year, the Chinese company completed the purchase of the personal computer business of IBM, after the administration of President George W. Bush concluded a national security review. Given the nod, Lenovo figured it was free to do business in the US just like any other personal computer company.
But the State Department decision suggests that it is not that simple. "Unfortunately, we're in a situation where certain people in Congress and elsewhere want to make a political issue of this," said Jeffrey Carlisle, vice president of government relations for Lenovo. "They are trying to create as uncomfortable an atmosphere as possible for us in doing business with the federal government."
Carlisle characterizes the worry that the Chinese government might secretly slip spying hardware or software on Lenovo computers shipped to the State Department as "a fantasy." The desktop machines, he said, will be made in Monterrey, Mexico, and Raleigh, N.C., at plants purchased from IBM.
"It's the same places, using the same processes as IBM had," Carlisle said. "Nothing's changed."
Representative Frank R. Wolf, however, said that the change of ownership changes a lot. In a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice earlier this month, he wrote that because of the Chinese government's "coordinated espionage program" intended to steal US secrets, the Lenovo computers "should not be used in the classified network."
Wolf is the chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees the budget appropriations for the State Department, Commerce Department and Justice Department.
bipartisan decision
In an interview on Monday, Wolf said the security concerns about the State Department's use of Lenovo computers had been brought to his attention by two members of the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a bipartisan group appointed by Congress.
"They deserve the credit for this," Wolf said.
Larry Wortzel, a member of the review commission and former military attache to the US embassy in Beijing, said he and another commission member, Michael Wessel, began looking into the sale in March. What most concerned them, he said, was that 900 of the Lenovo computers were intended for use on the State Department's classified networks.
Lenovo is partly owned by the Chinese government, which holds 27 percent. "This is a company owned and beholden to agencies of the People's Republic of China," Wortzel said. "Our assumption is that if the Chinese intelligence agencies could take action, they would take action."
After meetings with US government securities agencies, including classified briefings, Wortzel and Wessel concluded that it would be possible for the Chinese government to put clandestine hardware or software on personal computers that might be able to tap into US intelligence.
"This is not off the wall as to whether there are potential security concerns here," Wessel said.
Both Wortzel and Wessel insisted that theirs is not an anti-China stance or even anti-Lenovo.
"I'm sure they are very good computers," Wortzel said. "I would use them in my home. But I would not use one on a classified network at the State Department."
The State Department said last week that it would not use the Lenovo computers on its classified networks. In a letter to Wolf, Richard Griffin, assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, said that the department had "consulted with US government security experts and is recommending that the computers purchased last fall be utilized on unclassified systems only."
routine testing
The letter added that the State Department was "initiating changes in its procurement processes in light of the changing ownership" of computer equipment suppliers.
A spokesman said that "to allay any possible fears and any possible concerns, this is where we came out."
Certainly, there are fears aplenty these days in any matter related to China. Carlisle of Lenovo insists any security fears about its computers are unfounded. The company's computers and the software loaded on them are routinely tested inside the company and, on the State Department sale, by third-party US contractors.
"If anything were detected, it would be a death warrant for the company," Carlisle said. "No one would ever buy another Lenovo PC. It would make no sense to do it."
Lenovo, industry analysts say, may well have the stronger argument, but it may still suffer.
"Basically, this is much ado about nothing," said Roger Kay, president of Endpoint Technologies Associates. "Unfortunately, perceptions count. And the damage has already been done."
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
Is a new foreign partner for Taiwan emerging in the Middle East? Last week, Taiwanese media reported that Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) secretly visited Israel, a country with whom Taiwan has long shared unofficial relations but which has approached those relations cautiously. In the wake of China’s implicit but clear support for Hamas and Iran in the wake of the October 2023 assault on Israel, Jerusalem’s calculus may be changing. Both small countries facing literal existential threats, Israel and Taiwan have much to gain from closer ties. In his recent op-ed for the Washington Post, President William
A stabbing attack inside and near two busy Taipei MRT stations on Friday evening shocked the nation and made headlines in many foreign and local news media, as such indiscriminate attacks are rare in Taiwan. Four people died, including the 27-year-old suspect, and 11 people sustained injuries. At Taipei Main Station, the suspect threw smoke grenades near two exits and fatally stabbed one person who tried to stop him. He later made his way to Eslite Spectrum Nanxi department store near Zhongshan MRT Station, where he threw more smoke grenades and fatally stabbed a person on a scooter by the roadside.
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
RSS