One might question the appropriateness of presenting a dagger to Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej, to mark his 60th year on the throne next month.
The gesture sounds doubly suspect when the weapon is coming from villages in Thailand's troubled deep south, where more than 1,200 people have died in government crackdowns, revenge killings, explosions and beheadings since January 2004.
But in Balukaluwa village in Raman district of Yala Province the special gift of a hand-crafted kris makes perfect cultural sense.
"Traditionally, the kris was the personal weapon of the sultan. It should only be worn by someone with great power," said Sakon Yotmannee, a Raman district officer who will preside over a competition planned for Sunday.
At least 20 artisans from Balukaluwa and other southern towns will enter the contest to choose the region's first kris fit for a king.
The winning weapon will be presented to King Bhumibol to celebrate the 60th anniversary of his ascension to the throne on June 9, 1946.
The kris is a small dagger with a wavy blade whose cultural roots are in Malaysia and Indonesia, where the weapon has long been a symbol of virility and strength.
The dagger, and the fairly sophisticated metallurgy technology that goes in to making it, might have completely died out in Thailand's deep south if not for the royal family.
"The art of kris making disappeared in Thailand for a generation," said Teepalee Atabu, one of the new generation of kris makers in Raman district.
Teepalee secretly studied kris-making with his "guru," Tuan Bukut Long Salee, one of the last Raman kris artisans who died two years ago.
Teepalee was teaching kris-making as part of a vocational training course held at the Chang Hai Buddhist temple in nearby Narathiwat in 1999, when the famed place of worship was visited by Thai Queen Sirikit.
"When she visited the temple and saw villagers studying kris-making, she encouraged the government officials to help us preserve the art as an important handicraft," Teepalee recalled.
Since that royal visit, nobody has prevented southern villagers from kris-making, even though the production remains illegal under Thai law.
The Raman district was formerly famed for its kris artisans, who sold their products in Pattani, Narathiwat and Yala -- Thailand's three, majority Muslim, southernmost provinces -- but also across the border in Malaysia.
Kris-making was banned in the area during World War II, under the iron-fisted rule of Thailand's military dictator Field Marshal Plaek Pibulsongkhram.
Plaek, an ultra-nationalist, outlawed all forms of weapon-making in the troubled southern provinces while also forcing residents to stop wearing Malay sarongs and speaking the Yawi (Malaysian) language in an effort to impose Thai culture on the area.
The deep south, once an independent Islamic sultanate, was first conquered by Bangkok in 1786, but only came under direct rule of the Thai bureaucracy in 1902.
A separatist struggle has simmered in the area for decades, fueled by the local population's sense of religious and cultural alienation from the predominantly Buddhist Thai state that remains today.
Kris-making, although more an offspring of Brahmanism than Islam, remains an essential aspect of the deep south's Malay identity.
Ironically, kris-making technology is also threatened in Malaysia and Indonesia, which may prove good news for the new kris artisans of Raman district.
"Many merchants from Malaysia come here to buy our krises," Teepalee said. "But we're hoping that after the competition in Yala we can form a kris-making association that we can use to pool our resources to help market the krises abroad."
And it appears that the violence in the region has yet to cut into the kris business.
"The violence has had no impact on sales because the villagers here can't make enough krises to keep up with demand," district officer Sakon said.
He acknowledged, however, that fewer buyers had visited the area over the past two years so it would be best for the villagers to begin marketing their products themselves.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath