To the amazement of city-dwelling Australians, young backpacking tourists are being lured off the continent's beaches to work on inland farms in a government initiative swiftly condemned by trade unionists as a means to drive wages down.
From July 1, new visa rules will encourage backpackers to stay in the country for up to two years, provided they work between three and six months in an expanded range of jobs that Australians don't want to take.
Fruit growers, for example, say the move will stop fruit from rotting on the trees. Opponents say the fruit rots as no Australian is interested in seasonal work that pays under A$10 (US$7.60) an hour and doesn't always include a free shed to sleep in.
Peter Mares, at the Institute of Social Research in Melbourne, says the government has shifted its original reciprocal 18-30 year old age group working holiday agreements with 20 countries from "a lifestyle experience for young travelers to a labor market program."
The national secretary of the Australian Workers Union, Bill Shorten, was blunter.
"All this is going to do is drive down wages. It's nothing short of the `Mexicanization' of Australia's rural workers," he said.
Shorten emphasized that he was not being patronizing toward Mexicans, but referring to the controversy in the US over its large population of technically illegal low-wage immigrant workers from across its southern border, whose labor, US companies and analysts claim, is crucial to corporate profits and the national interest.
Immigration Minister Senator Amanda Vanstone recently announced the changes after a prolonged campaign by the National Farmers Federation and rural commerce lobbies to find cheap labor.
The campaigning had moved into high gear over the last two southern summers as Senator Vanstone's inspectors raided increasing numbers of rural properties and carted off coach loads of cheap, hard working and predominantly Third World nationals who had overstayed their tourist visas and illegally taken employment.
The revised "Working Holiday Maker Scheme" includes visitors from most of the EU, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Thailand. A similar deal is under negotiation with the US.
And the minister has signaled a likely deal with some of Australia's poorest Pacific island neighbors, including the troubled Solomon Islands, to allow seasonal guest workers to ease shortages in forestry, horticultural and vegetable growing industries where manual labour cannot be adequately replaced by machines.
Other small nations like Kiribati and Tonga have been urging Australia to put out an official welcome mat for some years, as they struggle to employ a tide of restless young people who envy the lifestyles of their New Zealand and Australian neighbors.
The math of the new scheme is attractive but for now highly selective in that it targets young travelers from wealthy countries rather than the Third World.
The half million or so backpackers who enter Australia annually have been surveyed as spending an average of almost A$5,000 (US$3,810) on goods and services on a typical three month trip around the country even if they don't engage in part time work.
Those who join the official scheme are liable for income tax, except that their first A$6,000 will be exempt, and they will not only receive a tax refund after their holiday, but a full refund of the compulsory 9 percent national superannuation levy paid on their behalf by employers if they earn more than A$450 a month.
The tourism industry likes the arrangement. It sees the extended working holiday rules not as salvation for cattle or sheep farmers on remote properties too far from the bright lights of towns to attract a new generation of drovers, but as a way of encouraging backpackers to stay longer and actually spend more.
Backpackers see romance and experience where too many Australians, most of them living within the eight major cities, see nothing but dust, flies, heat, and semi ghost towns, where children leave home as soon as possible to find fame and fortune in "the big smoke."
Yet the young, rich "guest worker" program is symptomatic of more than the city-country divide that has made Australia two countries in the last quarter century after competition law reforms sparked a wholesale closure of banking, medical, retail, and transport services in "bush" towns.
Mares says the modern day equivalent of indentured tourist labour, where you work for the right to enjoy a longer holiday earn pocket money along the way, is just a stop-gap measure.
"This is only putting off the day we will have to sit down and take a long hard look at the problems facing regional Australia by the growing dearth of workers," he says.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath