The leader of US armed forces in the Pacific and Asia, Admiral William Fallon, says the commander of Special Operations Forces in this region, Major General David Fridovich, is "the tip of the spear" in the war against terror in the vast area stretching from Hawaii to India.
An immediate target for that spear is a remote island chain running from the southern Philippines, where Muslim terrorists train, to Malaysia and Indonesia. Terrorists infiltrate into those nations by island-hopping down that chain, then fade into the population. US special operations troops often slip quietly into position there to help block the infiltration and to break up terrorist cells.
Beyond that, US Special Operations Forces work mostly out of the public eye throughout Southeast Asia to assist national authorities in combating terror.
Southeast Asia has become an active arena for international terror even though Muslims there are considered to be tolerant of other religions and secular institutions.
Radical movements
The objective of the radical Muslims, a relatively small portion of the populations, is to overthrow existing national governments in Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei and local governments in southern Thailand and the southern Philippines. They would then forge a new nation ruled by Islamic law.
Radical Muslim movements in Southeast Asia are mostly homegrown, but over time have become loosely affiliated with al-Qaeda, the terrorist band led by Osama bin Laden. Many Southeast Asian terrorist leaders in the 1990s were trained in Afghanistan, bin Laden's base.
Probably the most active group is Jemaah Islamiyah, of Indonesia; it was charged with the Bali bombing of 2002 in which 202 people died in the first terrorist act of the modern day in Southeast Asia. Another is Laskar Jihad. Still another Indonesian group is Laskar Pembela Islam. A smaller group is Kumpulan Mujahideen Malaysia.
In the Philippines are Abu Sayyaf, the Moro National Liberation Front and a splinter group, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front. They trace their origins to the Moros of Mindanao, Muslims who sought to secede from the largely Roman Catholic Philippines in the late 19th century.
Against this array, the Special Operations Command under Fridovich is the military vanguard against terror in the Pacific and Asia. At his promotion ceremony last month, Fallon said Fridovich's troops were "engaged at the grassroots level" in establishing working relations with other nations.
Special Operations Forces, known as SOF, include Army Rangers and Special Forces (Green Berets), Navy SEALS (sea, air, land), the Air Force's special operations aviation regiment, a new Marine unit in training and psychological operations and civil affairs units.
Much of SOF's work is clandestine and done in small groups that are assembled for a mission, deployed and broken up once they get home. In addition to military skills, SOFs are taught the basics of the languages and cultures of the nations to which they are dispatched.
Teachers
Fridovich emphasized that a primary task of US SOF was to work with Asians, not to fight terror by themselves.
"We are teachers," he said in an interview. "We're building capacity when we're in various locations and we leave these areas when they are capable of doing it on their own."
"We work through, by and with local forces and citizens," he said. "We work through the capability that the countries believe they need to get the mission accomplished. This is done by the countries we partner with, and we work with the local forces and citizens."
Not all have been successful. Since 2002, US SOF units have sought to help the Philippine armed forces defeat the Abu Sayyaf. Fallon told a Senate committee, however, that the southern Philippines "remain a sanctuary, training and recruiting ground for terrorist organizations."
To enhance cooperation, Fridovich invited leaders of Asian SOFs from 22 nations along with academic specialists, counter-terror experts, academics and intelligence analysts to Honolulu for a weeklong conference last month.
Among them were representatives from China, with which the US has sought to expand military exchanges.
A conference report asserted that terrorists and the West often compete for the support of deprived people.
"Finding a way to get there first," the report said, "and give people a leg up without creating resentment and before the terrorists can influence them appears to be a key challenge."
The summary stressed effective counter-terrorist communications but added: "If we do not appreciate the complexity and richness of the values and concerns of the people with whom we are communicating, we will miss the mark."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing