After almost four centuries of being plundered and imposed upon by various foreign powers, you could forgive the average Taiwanese for being a little xenophobic. But we are a friendly bunch in general, and we don't mind helping out the old "big noses" if they are having trouble buying a pack of LongLifes in the local 7-Eleven or 10 dumplings at a roadside stall.
However, this kind of behavior may have to come to an end soon, as it seems as if the global community is getting the wrong impression of "Ilha Formosa."
It appears as if my beloved homeland, like my gal, Cathy Pacific -- until she met me of course -- has developed a reputation for being easy, a sort of Sisy Chen (陳文茜) of the international community.
Why, only last week there was a story on the China Post's Web site entitled "Dominican Republic considers relations with China," in which Dominican Foreign Minister Carlos Morales Troncoso was quoted as saying: "We are going to look at Taiwan's offers and we will see if Taiwan or China is better for the Dominican Republic."
Which, literally translated, means: "We will establish or keep relations with whoever offers us the most cash."
What cheek. And this is one of our supposedly long-term diplomatic "friends." With friends like these, who needs enemies?
This story was quickly followed by a piece from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation: "Northern Marianas looks to Taiwan for investment," talking about the governor of Saipan -- which isn't even a bloody country -- coming here looking for cash.
Then I noticed an article in The Hindu entitled "Hu to press Bush to contain Taiwan independence bid," concerning relations between the US, China and Taiwan, in which Taiwan is referred to as the "cash-rich island."
This got me worried, as with word traveling to India that Taiwan is loaded and a soft touch, don't expect it to be too long before some mysterious swami turns up in Taipei claiming to be a relative of Mahatma Gandhi and a representative of the Indian government, before walking out of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with a suitcase full of cash in return for promises of re-establishing diplomatic relations with India, getting Taiwan into the WHO and making China's 800 missiles disappear.
While we are on the subject of sad old farts on foreign journeys, I couldn't write this week's column without a mention of former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) trip to China.
But that's about all I want to say about it, as the wire copy about his trip was about as unremarkable as the man himself. But then what do you expect from someone who can put a political rally to sleep from a distance of 100 paces?
Lien's toadying to the Chinese leadership and his refusal to acknowledge the existence of the Republic of China (Taiwan) while visiting China would make old Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) turn in his grave -- if he had one.
I once went to Beijing on a short break with old Mama Neihu, but I didn't like it one bit. First of all, there was the language barrier. Everyone there rolled their "r's" so much it sounded like I was in a cheap western. Come to think of it, and since watching Ang Lee's (李安) latest flick, maybe that's why everyone kept calling me "comrade" (most worrying for a red-blooded Taiwanese male like myself).
Second, the food wasn't nearly authentic enough. And last but not least, there were signs up in Tiananmen Square forbidding spitting. Now what is a man to do with his betel nut?
Changing tack, an interesting article entitled "Back away from Taiwan, author advises Washington" that ran in the Sydney Morning Herald on April 15 caught my attention.
In the piece, "defense and foreign policy analyst" Ted Galen Carpenter at the Cato Institute said that: "Rather than promising to defend Taiwan, Washington should step up arms shipments to help Taiwan defend itself."
Step up arms shipments? Where has this guy been for the last two years? Has he never heard of the pan-blues? But then, what do you expect from someone who works at a place named after Inspector Clouseau's half-crazed karate-chopping manservant?
Being a proud Taiwanese, I would like to take the opportunity to congratulate our scientists on the successful launch of FORMOSAT-3. According to one press report: "Minotaur, the four-stage solid rocket that carried FORMOSAT-3 into space, was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California."
What excellent news. What did disappoint me, however, was that Taiwan's flag was not allowed to be displayed on the rocket's surface.
Instead we had to settle for the Chinese characters for Taiwan, along with a map of the island covered in pictures of fruit and fish produced by our beloved soil. This got me thinking that, in the light of the deal struck recently between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party and the absence of cross-strait cargo flights, maybe we could use these Minotaur rockets as a novel way of delivering Taiwan's fruit and fish exports to our friends across the Strait -- a taste of their own medicine, so to speak.
All this talk of outer space also reminded me of Acting Kaohsiung Mayor Yeh Chu-lan (葉菊蘭). I am especially concerned about what planet she lives on, as according to CNA on April 13 she announced plans to turn the southern port city into "Taiwan's Shangri-la, where politicians do not engage in dogfights and people have beautiful minds and enjoy a peaceful and prosperous life," to build the city into the "ocean capital of Taiwan where fragrant flowers bloom under bright sunshine," and make it a place where residents "love work, love sports and love cleanliness."
One can only wonder if the water supply for the mayor's office is being piped in directly from the Love River, as the chemical cocktails in that water would be enough to warp the mind of even the most seasoned politician.
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at