After almost four centuries of being plundered and imposed upon by various foreign powers, you could forgive the average Taiwanese for being a little xenophobic. But we are a friendly bunch in general, and we don't mind helping out the old "big noses" if they are having trouble buying a pack of LongLifes in the local 7-Eleven or 10 dumplings at a roadside stall.
However, this kind of behavior may have to come to an end soon, as it seems as if the global community is getting the wrong impression of "Ilha Formosa."
It appears as if my beloved homeland, like my gal, Cathy Pacific -- until she met me of course -- has developed a reputation for being easy, a sort of Sisy Chen (陳文茜) of the international community.
Why, only last week there was a story on the China Post's Web site entitled "Dominican Republic considers relations with China," in which Dominican Foreign Minister Carlos Morales Troncoso was quoted as saying: "We are going to look at Taiwan's offers and we will see if Taiwan or China is better for the Dominican Republic."
Which, literally translated, means: "We will establish or keep relations with whoever offers us the most cash."
What cheek. And this is one of our supposedly long-term diplomatic "friends." With friends like these, who needs enemies?
This story was quickly followed by a piece from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation: "Northern Marianas looks to Taiwan for investment," talking about the governor of Saipan -- which isn't even a bloody country -- coming here looking for cash.
Then I noticed an article in The Hindu entitled "Hu to press Bush to contain Taiwan independence bid," concerning relations between the US, China and Taiwan, in which Taiwan is referred to as the "cash-rich island."
This got me worried, as with word traveling to India that Taiwan is loaded and a soft touch, don't expect it to be too long before some mysterious swami turns up in Taipei claiming to be a relative of Mahatma Gandhi and a representative of the Indian government, before walking out of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with a suitcase full of cash in return for promises of re-establishing diplomatic relations with India, getting Taiwan into the WHO and making China's 800 missiles disappear.
While we are on the subject of sad old farts on foreign journeys, I couldn't write this week's column without a mention of former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) trip to China.
But that's about all I want to say about it, as the wire copy about his trip was about as unremarkable as the man himself. But then what do you expect from someone who can put a political rally to sleep from a distance of 100 paces?
Lien's toadying to the Chinese leadership and his refusal to acknowledge the existence of the Republic of China (Taiwan) while visiting China would make old Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) turn in his grave -- if he had one.
I once went to Beijing on a short break with old Mama Neihu, but I didn't like it one bit. First of all, there was the language barrier. Everyone there rolled their "r's" so much it sounded like I was in a cheap western. Come to think of it, and since watching Ang Lee's (李安) latest flick, maybe that's why everyone kept calling me "comrade" (most worrying for a red-blooded Taiwanese male like myself).
Second, the food wasn't nearly authentic enough. And last but not least, there were signs up in Tiananmen Square forbidding spitting. Now what is a man to do with his betel nut?
Changing tack, an interesting article entitled "Back away from Taiwan, author advises Washington" that ran in the Sydney Morning Herald on April 15 caught my attention.
In the piece, "defense and foreign policy analyst" Ted Galen Carpenter at the Cato Institute said that: "Rather than promising to defend Taiwan, Washington should step up arms shipments to help Taiwan defend itself."
Step up arms shipments? Where has this guy been for the last two years? Has he never heard of the pan-blues? But then, what do you expect from someone who works at a place named after Inspector Clouseau's half-crazed karate-chopping manservant?
Being a proud Taiwanese, I would like to take the opportunity to congratulate our scientists on the successful launch of FORMOSAT-3. According to one press report: "Minotaur, the four-stage solid rocket that carried FORMOSAT-3 into space, was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California."
What excellent news. What did disappoint me, however, was that Taiwan's flag was not allowed to be displayed on the rocket's surface.
Instead we had to settle for the Chinese characters for Taiwan, along with a map of the island covered in pictures of fruit and fish produced by our beloved soil. This got me thinking that, in the light of the deal struck recently between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party and the absence of cross-strait cargo flights, maybe we could use these Minotaur rockets as a novel way of delivering Taiwan's fruit and fish exports to our friends across the Strait -- a taste of their own medicine, so to speak.
All this talk of outer space also reminded me of Acting Kaohsiung Mayor Yeh Chu-lan (葉菊蘭). I am especially concerned about what planet she lives on, as according to CNA on April 13 she announced plans to turn the southern port city into "Taiwan's Shangri-la, where politicians do not engage in dogfights and people have beautiful minds and enjoy a peaceful and prosperous life," to build the city into the "ocean capital of Taiwan where fragrant flowers bloom under bright sunshine," and make it a place where residents "love work, love sports and love cleanliness."
One can only wonder if the water supply for the mayor's office is being piped in directly from the Love River, as the chemical cocktails in that water would be enough to warp the mind of even the most seasoned politician.
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath