The EU's decision on Monday to stop all direct aid to the Hamas-led Palestinian government follows weeks of internal hand-wringing on how to prevent total economic collapse in the West Bank and Gaza Strip without channelling aid through the militant Islamic group.
The EU aid freeze also represents a wake-up call, which EU ministers said could prompt Hamas leaders to rethink their hardline stance on Israel and the use of violence.
European governments were not seeking to punish Palestinians but to encourage Hamas to "adapt and transform to the realities of today," said EU foreign and security policy chief Javier Solana.
The EU move gave Hamas the possibility to think again about its policy directions, said German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier.
The EU decision to suspend aid was not taken lightly. For weeks EU foreign ministers had voiced hopes that election victory and government responsibilities would prompt a change in Hamas' policies.
EU External Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner told reporters in March that the bloc was hoping for "positive change" and keeping its door open to Hamas -- provided the militant group met certain key conditions, including recognition of Israel.
On Monday in Luxembourg, however, EU ministers voiced "grave concern" at the program of the new Palestinian government, saying it did not contain a clear commitment to the three principles laid out by the international community: non-violence, recognition of Israel's right to exist and acceptance of existing agreements.
"There is no signal that Hamas is ready to change," said Germany's Steinmeier.
As a result, ministers said all EU aid to the Palestinians was being reviewed. Pending such a reflection, direct assistance to the Palestinian government was being temporarily suspended.
Ministers tried to soften the impact of their aid suspension -- which could affect up to 50 percent of an estimated 500 million euros (US$605.9 million) worth of EU funded programs in the Palestinian territories -- by insisting that assistance to meet the "basic needs" of the Palestinian people would continue.
They also made another appeal for a change in Hamas policies and demanded that Israel's new government desist from actions that violate international law and threaten the viability of the two-state solution.
EU governments were seeking to be as balanced as possible in tackling the dilemma posed by the Hamas victory in January's Palestinian polls, EU diplomats told reporters.
But with the Hamas leadership sticking to its hardline stance -- and given the EU's decision to blacklist Hamas as a terrorist organization -- Europe could not finance the new Palestinian government or have formal contacts with Hamas.
"Business as usual will not be possible," Solana told reporters on Monday. The EU would, however, follow the situation on the ground very closely and "adapt our response to that," Solana insisted.
"We are accountable to our electorate and our taxpayers," said Austrian Foreign Minister Ursula Plassnik, referring to concerns that EU money could be used for Hamas operations against Israel.
Plassnik insisted, however, that aid to meet the basic human needs of the population, including medical assistance and education would continue.
The EU had no no wish "to punish" the Palestinian people, said British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw.
Continuing their difficult diplomatic juggling, EU ministers said the aid cut-off was only temporary while they come up with alternative ways of channelling funds to the Palestinians.
Straw said donors were seeking "other routes for the provision of funds so that ordinary people on the Palestinian street are not disadvantaged."
Identifying other ways of channelling aid to the Palestinians may not be that easy, however.
International aid agencies like Oxfam have warned that they do not have the capacity to run health and education services in the Palestinian Territories.
"The Palestinian Authority is responsible for this and therefore donors must keep funding it," Oxfam said.
Diplomats said one option under consideration was to deal directly with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who is from the Fatah group, rather than with the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority.
But there was concern that this would undermine the office of Palestinian premier, which the international community had tried to reinforce when Yasser Arafat was president.
There were also suggestions that the EU could pay the salaries of Palestinian teachers and doctors to ensure there was no disruption in these key sectors.
EU diplomats also insisted that Arab nations must come to the aid of the Palestinians.
But Ferrero-Waldner admitted the bloc was still mulling over different options. "We will come up with ideas ... we are not ready yet," she said.
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
RSS