In 2002, Japanese academic Kenichi Ohmae boldly predicted that Taiwan and China would be unified by 2005, and that the 2004 presidential election campaign would pivot around the question of how to unify with China, instead of whether or not to unify.
Ohmae's prediction did not come true: The pan-green camp with its "one country on each side" [of the Taiwan Strait] platform won the presidential election. In retrospect, the timing of Ohmae's prediction was wrong, but the direction may be right.
Just as Ohmae said, Taiwan is moving production facilities to China at an amazing speed. He said that Taiwan began gradually losing its key advantages over China in 2000, and that by 2008, China will have duplicated all of Taiwan's advantages, and the value of Taiwanese businesspeople will disappear.
On March 28, the Chinese-language United Evening News reported that Taiwan's major computer makers have moved 90 percent of their production to China. As a result, the 15,000 computers that the US State Department purchased recently were all "Made in China," the daily said. This proves that Ohmae's prediction of China"using business to promote unification" was right.
China's strategy has even greater political impact. By exchanging economic integration for business benefits, it anesthetizes Taiwanese consciousness and gradually integrates it into the "greater China" cause. Only a few years ago, China-based Taiwanese businesspeople still felt some guilt when confronted by the public. Today, they have become the government's "favorite sons."
In the past, no politician dared visit China. Now, not only are some willing to accept China's pandas but they also boldly promote the idea of unification without fearing a backlash.
An analysis by Robert Ross in the US publication Foreign Affairs entitled "Taiwan's fading independence movement" gives a fairly close summation: "The rapid growth of China's economy has given Beijing leverage over Taiwan's economy. In 2001, the mainland became Taiwan's most important export market [last year, it accounted for about 40 percent of Taiwan's exports], and since 2002, more than half of Taiwan's foreign investment has gone there. Without firing a shot, therefore, China could cause chaos in Taiwan."
The journal concluded that Taiwan's independence movement is fading, and that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is no longer afraid to be labeled a "mainlander party," since "46 percent [of the Taiwanese] believed that the KMT was the party most capable of handling cross-strait relations."
During his recent US trip, KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) talked about not only the opening of direct links and economic integration, but also a cross-strait "modus vivendi" -- a temporary agreement before a permanent settlement is officially reached -- for Taiwan's participation in the international community. He even suggested that China unite with its secondary enemy (the KMT) to combat its primary enemy (Taiwanese independence).
Many now view further economic integration as politically correct. Take, for example, the complementary mechanism to the "active management" policy proposed by the Cabinet. The strongest criticism came from within the Democratic Progressive Party. Some party members even threatened to propose a "China policy resolution" at the party's national assembly in July to demand the opening up of the cross-strait economy and trade.
Just like cancer cells spreading inside a body, China's policy of using business to promote unification has spread to every corner of the island. Ohmae's prediction is coming true as we speak.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath