The "Ma Ying-jeou (
If one were to accept everything portrayed in the news coverage without taking a break to reflect, it would seem that Ma was ready to be proclaimed Lord of the pan-blues and lead the KMT back to the Presidential Office, leaving the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) shuddering with fear in his shadow before the 2008 presidential campaign even starts.
What exactly is the "Ma Ying-jeou phenomenon?"
It is nothing more than the media's selective representation and magnification of Ma, elevated by his visit to the US, into a myth, and the migration of the country's political scene into the realm of the entertainment sector.
A simple glance at Ma's press conference in Los Angeles shows how the "Ma Ying-jeou phenomenon" has come about.
Groups of reporters swarmed around Ma to get his signature, looking more like members of a fan club than professional journalists on assignment.
When reporters become fans of their subject, how can they apply the necessary skills of judgment, critique and reasoning to their coverage?
Behaving unprofessionally is one thing, but acting like groupies oversteps the limit. Yet this was the case when a group of Taiwanese reporters surrounded Ma and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. The news clip showed giggling reporters flanking the pair. One reporter thought that the question Taiwanese TV viewers really wanted Newsom to answer was: "Do you think Ma Ying-jeou is handsome?" Did the TV stations really send reporters all the way to the US just to ask such a stupid question?
If only they could look beyond the glossy news coverage and scrutinize the underlying issues.
For instance, Ma's proposal to seek an interim peace accord with China to "formally terminate the state of hostility across the Taiwan Strait and enable the two sides to interact with each other in peace" for 30 to 50 years is old hat. It has been brought up by US officials and academics before and was rejected by the Clinton administration.
But let's hypothesize for a moment that events do favor Ma's approach. What will happen after 30 or 50 years? Will China then declare war on Taiwan? Signing this kind of an agreement is tantamount to signing a death certificate on Taiwan's efforts to become a normal country and abandoning the movement to build Taiwanese consciousness.
There is cause for deep concern about Taiwan's future if the public continues to allow a politician such as Ma to speak on its behalf in the international arena, pampered and unscrutinized by the media.
As far as the "Ma Ying-jeou phenomenon" is concerned, Premier Su Tseng-chang (
The DPP should remain steady on its own path rather than allow itself to be distracted or provoked by the pro-China media's schoolgirl crush on the KMT's leader.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath