In the wake of President Chen Shui-bian's (
This attempt to lure those Taiwanese who may not be fully cognizant of cross-strait issues and international norms into obtaining Chinese ID cards is the latest attempt to underscore China's insistence that Taiwan is part of China.
Millions of Taiwanese travel to China for business or leisure each year, and under the "Taiwan Compatriot Travel Document," they are subjected to numerous inconveniences. But with a Chinese ID card, some think they will be able to enjoy the same rights that Chinese nationals have and, at the same time, enjoy the benefits of Taiwanese citizenship when they come home. They want the best of both worlds, but have they seriously thought of what this entails?
Although the Taiwanese government recognizes dual citizenship, it makes an exception with China, mainly because of Beijing's hostile attitude toward Taiwan. The Statute Governing the Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (
Getting a Chinese ID may appear to be a boon for some people. But along with that status comes the obligations that Chinese citizenship brings. If the Chinese government were to arrest a person or confiscate his or her property, that person's rights would be no different from the rest of China's population. This is what a person would be getting in exchange for the loss of his or her Taiwanese citizenship.
According to Article 11 of the Enforcement Regulations of the Act Governing Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (
Additionally, if a Taiwanese were to obtain a Chinese ID or passport, he or she would be considered as someone from the "mainland area," and may face considerable difficulties in both cross-strait and international travel. This person would be treated as a Chinese national when he or she applies to return to Taiwan, and may be regarded with suspicion by many other countries due to the problem of illegal immigration from China.
Taiwanese should see China's "united front" strategy for what it is. They should seek to gain a better understanding of Taiwan's laws and regulations, as well as China's political and social situation, rather than act precipitously. If people fail to look before they leap, they will one day find it is too late for regrets.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath