Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin Tai-hua (林岱樺) recently proposed dropping the nation's Republican calendar and making the universal Gregorian calendar the only official time system. Pan-blue legislators strongly opposed the proposal, saying that it amounted to another Cultural Revolution and an attempt to destroy history. To an outsider like me, Lin's proposition is in fact one way to help Taiwan connect with the rest of the world, march toward modernization and pursue democratization.
Most nations use the Gregorian calendar, but Taiwan uses the Republican calendar, which begins its count with the founding of the Republic of China in 1912. But how many people in the world understand that they need to add 1,911 years to Taiwan's Republican calendar system to reflect the current year according to the Gregorian calendar?
In fact, adopting the Gregorian calendar would truly represent the reality in Taiwan, conform to international norms and reflect public opinion. Earlier this month, the Presidential Office decided to change its official name of "Chiehshou Hall" -- (介壽館) given to the Presidential Office to express birthday wishes of longevity to dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) on his 60th birthday in 1949 -- to "Zongtong Fu" (總統府, the "Presidential Office"). The three characters are also now written from left to right, to embody the principle of modernization.
Decades ago, there were already intellectuals here who maintained that Taiwan should connect with the rest of the world and abolish the Republican calendar. They started a war of words with those antiquated people who were ready to die to protect the Republican heritage. Bo Yang (柏楊), the author of the famous book The Ugly Chinaman, suggested that texts should not be written top-down, right to left, for that practice does not conform to people's reading habits. Bo even lamented the way Chinese calligraphers of old wrote from right to left, saying that, "Wouldn't their elbows and sleeves blur the completed characters? This is simply irrational and illogical."
Internet users can tell that no matter what language, it is always written horizontally and almost never from right to left. This only goes to show that whatever the language or country, they are all complying with the way people use their eyes and brains. A Taiwanese decision to adopt the Gregorian calendar would be a first step towards conforming to international practice.
Pan-blue legislators are probably aware that they are not in a good position to defend their opposition to Lin's proposal. Therefore, they have decided to change their strategy by emphasizing how difficult it would be to implement such a change, claiming that it would cost a fortune to make related changes to the identification cards of all Taiwanese citizens, official documents and textbooks. In fact, what we can do is adopt the Gregorian calendar beginning now without changing old documents, so that we can gradually phase out the Republican calendar.
Pro-Beijing pan-blue legislators still oppose the idea, claiming that adopting the Gregorian system would mean accepting Beijing's "one country, two systems" principle. This argument is absurd. I remember that when Bo argued with the party-state intellectuals, they used the same kind of bent logic in claiming that Bo's promotion of a horizontal writing system was tantamount to being pro-Communist since Communist China used a horizontal writing system and the Gregorian calendar. A furious Bo wrote a reply saying that the members of the Chinese Communist Party shit with their asses and then asked if that meant we should put a plug in our behinds.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS