Ahead of the first anniversary of China's passage of the "Anti-Secession" Law on March 14, the Cabinet designated the day as a national remembrance day -- "Anti-Aggression Day" -- to remind the people of Taiwan of China's aggressive ambitions.
Meanwhile, in China, where the National People's Congress (NPC) was convening, NPC member Chen Yunying (
If China really did that, it would be the best thing that could happen, since protecting the interests of their Taiwanese compatriots is the exact opposite of committing aggression against Taiwan. Their Taiwanese compatriots are apparently still so poor that they are forced to eat banana peels to feed themselves, and that is why China needs to "protect" Taiwan by annexing it. Small wonder that Chen's husband had to swim from Kinmen to China to find food.
To commemorate this anniversary, some people in Taiwan claim that China is opposing Taiwanese independence rather than promoting unification. This claim ignores China's greedy and aggressive ambitions, and in fact helps make China look good. At the same time, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
So is it true that China is not promoting unification?
First of all, the "united front" strategy was one of Mao Zedong's (
I have heard nothing about them abolishing this department, nor have China's hired overseas organizations changed their activities from "opposing independence and promoting unification" to "preventing independence."
Nor have I heard any Chinese officials announce any strategic changes.
Second, China's defense expenditures will increase by 14.7 percent this year. This is the largest annual increase in recent years -- and that still doesn't include other, hidden spending.
Meanwhile, in addition to the annual rise in the number of missiles it has aimed at Taiwan, the People's Liberation Army has announced that it will begin developing aircraft carriers.
From the perspective of military strength, those who talk about preventing independence must be asked where they draw the line between preventing independence and promoting unification.
Third, toward the end of his stint as KMT chairman, Lien Chan (
Can it really be that cooperation between the KMT and the CCP has reached the level where the KMT relieves the CCP of its task to promote unification and takes it upon itself to perform this task instead?
This being the situation, we must ask whether certain KMT politicians have already taken up positions as CCP spokespersons and are working to explain CCP strategy.
There are indeed two advantages to having the KMT explain changes in CCP policy. One advantage is that it is deceptive, because no matter what the KMT's image is, it will be better than the CCP's. The second advantage is that the CCP escapes responsibility, so in future, the KMT alone will have to bear full responsibility for having deceived the Taiwanese people.
Becoming a Chinese pawn is Ma's own choice, since he is gambling with his own political future. But the people of Taiwan should think twice about the fact that he is putting up their democracy and freedom in his game with the CCP.
Paul Lin is a New York-based political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath