President Chen Shui-bian's (
First, China's economy is dominated by state-owned enterprises, and its foreign trade and foreign exchange markets remain under strict government control.
Also, given that there is a wide disparity in terms of population and amount of territory between Taiwan and China, if cheap goods from China's state-owned factories are allowed to flood Taiwan, this will cause great damage to Taiwan's economy.
Even the US, which is so much bigger than Taiwan, has felt the results of China's unfair trade practices. The US trade deficit with China hit a record US$200 billion last year, a figure that has concerned both the government and opposition parties.
This has happened despite the fact that US foreign trade accounts for only 16 percent of its economy.
This is not the case for other global powers like Japan, whose foreign trade comprises one quarter of its economy, and China, where the figure is more than 75 percent.
These figures indicate that China's economy depends more heavily on the US than the other way around.
Second, China has clearly shown its intention to promote a "united front" agenda via business channels. The purpose of Beijing's ongoing advocacy of the "mini three links" is to control Taiwan through trade and the economy, because in this way it can realize its ultimate goal of annexing Taiwan.
If Taiwan continues to allow a situation in which there is considerable capital outflow, this will give China a stick with which to pressure Taiwan in any future negotiations.
Pro-independence Taiwanese businessman Hsu Wen-lung (
Their examples show that China's "united front" tactics have yielded concrete results. The more capital Taiwanese businesspeople invest in China, the more leverage they give Beijing to force Taipei to accept its political agenda.
This is clearly a very dangerous situation.
Finally, it only requires a crisis in China's economy to entangle Taiwan in severe financial difficulties.
According to World Bank figures, the volume of bad debt in Chinese banks has reached US$600 billion, a quarter of China's GDP.
This worsening of this crisis is only being held in check by China's high level of savings. Chinese save around 45 percent of income, the world's highest rate, because they have little confidence in the future.
As soon as there is a financial crisis, these savings will be withdrawn, and this could trigger an economic collapse.
In the US, confidence reigns, so the savings rate is in negative figures (minus 0.5 percent). According to figures from Time magazine, the average savings ratio in the US from 1929 is a mere 7.6 percent.
Japan last year initiated "active management" policies in regard to its outward investment. It has shifted its investment focus from China to India, contributing to a 42 percent increase in the Indian stock market.
Taiwan must also diversify its investments. With the incorporation of diversification into its own "active management" policy, this will protect the development of the economy and serve as an important plank in its security.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Ian Bartholomew
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS