President Chen Shui-bian's (
First, China's economy is dominated by state-owned enterprises, and its foreign trade and foreign exchange markets remain under strict government control.
Also, given that there is a wide disparity in terms of population and amount of territory between Taiwan and China, if cheap goods from China's state-owned factories are allowed to flood Taiwan, this will cause great damage to Taiwan's economy.
Even the US, which is so much bigger than Taiwan, has felt the results of China's unfair trade practices. The US trade deficit with China hit a record US$200 billion last year, a figure that has concerned both the government and opposition parties.
This has happened despite the fact that US foreign trade accounts for only 16 percent of its economy.
This is not the case for other global powers like Japan, whose foreign trade comprises one quarter of its economy, and China, where the figure is more than 75 percent.
These figures indicate that China's economy depends more heavily on the US than the other way around.
Second, China has clearly shown its intention to promote a "united front" agenda via business channels. The purpose of Beijing's ongoing advocacy of the "mini three links" is to control Taiwan through trade and the economy, because in this way it can realize its ultimate goal of annexing Taiwan.
If Taiwan continues to allow a situation in which there is considerable capital outflow, this will give China a stick with which to pressure Taiwan in any future negotiations.
Pro-independence Taiwanese businessman Hsu Wen-lung (
Their examples show that China's "united front" tactics have yielded concrete results. The more capital Taiwanese businesspeople invest in China, the more leverage they give Beijing to force Taipei to accept its political agenda.
This is clearly a very dangerous situation.
Finally, it only requires a crisis in China's economy to entangle Taiwan in severe financial difficulties.
According to World Bank figures, the volume of bad debt in Chinese banks has reached US$600 billion, a quarter of China's GDP.
This worsening of this crisis is only being held in check by China's high level of savings. Chinese save around 45 percent of income, the world's highest rate, because they have little confidence in the future.
As soon as there is a financial crisis, these savings will be withdrawn, and this could trigger an economic collapse.
In the US, confidence reigns, so the savings rate is in negative figures (minus 0.5 percent). According to figures from Time magazine, the average savings ratio in the US from 1929 is a mere 7.6 percent.
Japan last year initiated "active management" policies in regard to its outward investment. It has shifted its investment focus from China to India, contributing to a 42 percent increase in the Indian stock market.
Taiwan must also diversify its investments. With the incorporation of diversification into its own "active management" policy, this will protect the development of the economy and serve as an important plank in its security.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Ian Bartholomew
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS