President Chen Shui-bian's (
First, China's economy is dominated by state-owned enterprises, and its foreign trade and foreign exchange markets remain under strict government control.
Also, given that there is a wide disparity in terms of population and amount of territory between Taiwan and China, if cheap goods from China's state-owned factories are allowed to flood Taiwan, this will cause great damage to Taiwan's economy.
Even the US, which is so much bigger than Taiwan, has felt the results of China's unfair trade practices. The US trade deficit with China hit a record US$200 billion last year, a figure that has concerned both the government and opposition parties.
This has happened despite the fact that US foreign trade accounts for only 16 percent of its economy.
This is not the case for other global powers like Japan, whose foreign trade comprises one quarter of its economy, and China, where the figure is more than 75 percent.
These figures indicate that China's economy depends more heavily on the US than the other way around.
Second, China has clearly shown its intention to promote a "united front" agenda via business channels. The purpose of Beijing's ongoing advocacy of the "mini three links" is to control Taiwan through trade and the economy, because in this way it can realize its ultimate goal of annexing Taiwan.
If Taiwan continues to allow a situation in which there is considerable capital outflow, this will give China a stick with which to pressure Taiwan in any future negotiations.
Pro-independence Taiwanese businessman Hsu Wen-lung (
Their examples show that China's "united front" tactics have yielded concrete results. The more capital Taiwanese businesspeople invest in China, the more leverage they give Beijing to force Taipei to accept its political agenda.
This is clearly a very dangerous situation.
Finally, it only requires a crisis in China's economy to entangle Taiwan in severe financial difficulties.
According to World Bank figures, the volume of bad debt in Chinese banks has reached US$600 billion, a quarter of China's GDP.
This worsening of this crisis is only being held in check by China's high level of savings. Chinese save around 45 percent of income, the world's highest rate, because they have little confidence in the future.
As soon as there is a financial crisis, these savings will be withdrawn, and this could trigger an economic collapse.
In the US, confidence reigns, so the savings rate is in negative figures (minus 0.5 percent). According to figures from Time magazine, the average savings ratio in the US from 1929 is a mere 7.6 percent.
Japan last year initiated "active management" policies in regard to its outward investment. It has shifted its investment focus from China to India, contributing to a 42 percent increase in the Indian stock market.
Taiwan must also diversify its investments. With the incorporation of diversification into its own "active management" policy, this will protect the development of the economy and serve as an important plank in its security.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Ian Bartholomew
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS