President Chen Shui-bian's (
First, China's economy is dominated by state-owned enterprises, and its foreign trade and foreign exchange markets remain under strict government control.
Also, given that there is a wide disparity in terms of population and amount of territory between Taiwan and China, if cheap goods from China's state-owned factories are allowed to flood Taiwan, this will cause great damage to Taiwan's economy.
Even the US, which is so much bigger than Taiwan, has felt the results of China's unfair trade practices. The US trade deficit with China hit a record US$200 billion last year, a figure that has concerned both the government and opposition parties.
This has happened despite the fact that US foreign trade accounts for only 16 percent of its economy.
This is not the case for other global powers like Japan, whose foreign trade comprises one quarter of its economy, and China, where the figure is more than 75 percent.
These figures indicate that China's economy depends more heavily on the US than the other way around.
Second, China has clearly shown its intention to promote a "united front" agenda via business channels. The purpose of Beijing's ongoing advocacy of the "mini three links" is to control Taiwan through trade and the economy, because in this way it can realize its ultimate goal of annexing Taiwan.
If Taiwan continues to allow a situation in which there is considerable capital outflow, this will give China a stick with which to pressure Taiwan in any future negotiations.
Pro-independence Taiwanese businessman Hsu Wen-lung (
Their examples show that China's "united front" tactics have yielded concrete results. The more capital Taiwanese businesspeople invest in China, the more leverage they give Beijing to force Taipei to accept its political agenda.
This is clearly a very dangerous situation.
Finally, it only requires a crisis in China's economy to entangle Taiwan in severe financial difficulties.
According to World Bank figures, the volume of bad debt in Chinese banks has reached US$600 billion, a quarter of China's GDP.
This worsening of this crisis is only being held in check by China's high level of savings. Chinese save around 45 percent of income, the world's highest rate, because they have little confidence in the future.
As soon as there is a financial crisis, these savings will be withdrawn, and this could trigger an economic collapse.
In the US, confidence reigns, so the savings rate is in negative figures (minus 0.5 percent). According to figures from Time magazine, the average savings ratio in the US from 1929 is a mere 7.6 percent.
Japan last year initiated "active management" policies in regard to its outward investment. It has shifted its investment focus from China to India, contributing to a 42 percent increase in the Indian stock market.
Taiwan must also diversify its investments. With the incorporation of diversification into its own "active management" policy, this will protect the development of the economy and serve as an important plank in its security.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Ian Bartholomew
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS