With the first phase of Indonesia's peace pact with Aceh rebels smoothly navigated, the next challenge will be countering nationalist sentiment in Jakarta where parliament must pass a contentious autonomy law, analysts say.
Implementation of the historic accord, signed in the wake of the December 2004 tsunami tragedy, which forced both the government and the separatist Free Aceh Movement (GAM) to reassess priorities, has so far surpassed expectations.
Rebels in the staunchly Muslim province at the tip of Sumatra surrendered their arsenal of 840 weapons by the end of last year as they had promised.
In return, the Indonesian military and police withdrew all of their non-local forces.
Attention is now focusing on a draft law completed last week by the home affairs ministry that grants wide-ranging autonomy to resource-rich Aceh and must be passed, according to the pact that was signed in Helsinki, by the end of March.
"What we face in the next few months will not be an easy task because it might involve political and nationalist sentiment in Jakarta," warned Afrizal Tjoetra from the Aceh Society Taskforce, which helped draft the law.
The law will pave the way for local elections to be held immediately.
"If everyone can look at it from the perspective of a peaceful settlement in Aceh, there will be no meaningful problems," Tjoetra said.
"But if political perspective and interests are involved, then everything will be different," he said.
The most likely candidate for scuttling the process appears to be former president Megawati Sukarnoputri, leader of the nationalist Indonesian Democracy Party for Struggle, the country's largest opposition party.
Megawati, who was ousted by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in October 2004 elections, has aired resistance to a clause in the pact which would be enshrined in the new law.
"It is difficult for us to accept one of the clauses in the agreement which requires decisions of the government and parliament to get the approval of the Aceh executive and legislature," she said last week, according to reports in local media.
"Even in federal states, things are not like that," she said.
Lawmaker Priyo Budi Santoso from the largest party Golkar said 23 chapters or about one-fifth of the total were where "thorough debates may take place."
These include chapters concerning the creation of local political parties, how to share spoils from Aceh's lucrative gas and oil deposits and the potential for new provinces to split off.
Under the peace deal, which is aimed at ending nearly three decades of conflict, the government conceded that it would allow the establishment of local political parties in Aceh.
Local political parties were previously outlawed in the country.
Determining a revenue-sharing ratio between the central government and Aceh could become a minefield, Santoso cautioned, while the push by several Aceh districts to form their own provinces has not been welcomed by former rebels.
Megawati's party has insufficient numbers to block the law, although it could do so if it convinces minor parties to join its ranks.
Nevertheless, Santoso remains upbeat that the law, which must be passed by a simple majority in the 500-seat legislature, will pass.
"We all have an interest in completing this law," Santoso said.
Political scientist J. Kristiadi, from the private think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the challenges ahead will relate to getting information to lawmakers and hitting on the right terminology in the law so that it does not offend the nationalists.
"I think that resistance in the parliament comes from the fact that many legislators have not really read the draft law and not followed the day-to-day process" of it being compiled, he said.
Foreign monitors who are overseeing the pact have hailed the completion of the crucial early phase, saying that the peace process has become irreversible.
Indonesian Vice President Yusuf Kalla is currently in Finland, and is reportedly scheduled to meet with exiled GAM leaders to discuss the future of the peace pact.
The separatist conflict claimed about 15,000 lives, most of them civilians, after GAM began its struggle for an independent state in 1976.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath