The victory of Socialist Michelle Bachelet in Chile's presidential election has reinforced Latin America's shift to the left.
Like Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, Brazil's Luiz Lula da Silva, Uruguay's Tabare Vasquez, Argentina's Nestor Kirchner and Bolivia's Evo Morales, the former paediatrician has also campaigned for the end to hardship for her country's poor, minorities and disadvantaged.
"Latin America is experiencing a rebellion against deprivation," said former Spanish prime minister Felipe Gonzalez, one of Bachelet's supporters.
But Bachelet, 54, who won 54 percent of the vote in Sunday's runoff election to become Chile's first woman president, represents a divergence from her ideological contemporaries in that she is no populist.
The former defense and health minister is calling for neither a political or economic revolution but a cultural one. She, therefore, is not distancing herself from her predecessors -- on the contrary.
"I am against the demonization of development in Latin America," Bachelet said. "There is no axis of evil here."
The region is not under threat from its democratically elected politicians, she said, "but from poverty, the lack of integration of its indigenous people, the drug trade and migration."
The Chilean political scientist Guillermo Holzman said he believes Bachelet, who is known as an "outside left" of the governing center-left coalition, will hardly touch the successful economic model and reforms of President Ricardo Lagos.
Chile has seen its gross domestic product grow about 6 percent annually in the past several years -- results seen by few countries in the world. It also saw US$7 billion in foreign investment last year, a substantial sum for a country of 15 million people.
In addition, its per-capita annual income of US$4,910 is 60 percent higher than the region's industrial giant, Brazil.
Despite these successes, 18 percent of Chileans continue to live below the poverty line, and the unemployment rate rose as high as 10 percent last year.
In addition, Chile has one of the world's 10 worst income disparities. The top 20 percent of the population own 56 percent of Chile's wealth while the bottom 20 percent account for 4 percent of its capital and income.
Lagos' projects targeting the poorest of Chile's citizens were timid. Bachelet -- considered the most leftist president since Salvador Allende, who was overthrown and died in the 1973 coup by General Augusto Pinochet -- is certain to expand them.
"With Bachelet, the candidate of the governing coalition indeed won," said Ricardo Nunez, president of the Socialist Party.
"But with her begins a new era with greater social justice, more rights for workers, pension reform and more and better education," he said.
Bachelet, with her sad family history -- her father was tortured to death under Pinochet's regime and she and her mother were jailed before fleeing into exile -- also is a symbol for many political analysts of Chile's rise from Pinochet's brutal 13-year military dictatorship as well as for the liberalization of Chile's ardently Catholic, archconservative and patriarchal society.
Divorce and advertising campaigns promoting the use of condoms were only introduced two years ago. Also new are the "cafes with legs," featuring waitresses in miniskirts, which was an unthinkable development only a few years ago.
"We are undergoing a cultural revolution," Professor Roberto Mendez said, adding that 10 years ago, Bachelet, a twice-divorced agnostic, would have stood no chance of winning the presidential vote.
But old beliefs and traditions die hard in Chile, and even though Bachelet's coalition will have a majority in both houses of Congress, which no other president in post-dictatorship Chile has had, the new president will not have an easy time of it.
"We are becoming another Spain, where homosexuals can now marry," said Ines, a primary schoolteacher in Santiago who had tears in her eyes after the election results were announced. God does not want such a thing, she said.
Taxi driver Alvaro, also a conservative Catholic, warned that Bachelet's fate would be the same as the founder of her Socialist Party.
"Mark my words, she will meet the same end as Salvador Allende," he predicted.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS