I wholly agree with Don Rodgers (Letters, Jan. 11, page 8) on his views on the political situation in Taiwan.
Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
Under the totalitarian rule of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in the latter half of the 20th century, the Taiwanese people were prohibited from exercising the right of referendum in all political matters. The main reason for this was that the KMT government was worried that its legitimacy might be challenged and that it might be overthrown, or worse, that Taiwan might declare independence from China by means of a referendum. Therefore, the word has become taboo, and something that is generally associated with independence.
The KMT regime long harbored an animosity against referendums, and Ma is no exception.
For instance, as chairman of Research, Development and Evaluation Commission under the Executive Yuan from 1988 to 1991, Ma was opposed to the idea of using referendums to make decisions on political matters. Therefore, his recent remarks as KMT chairman on the referendum proposal for direct cross-strait flights can only be seen as a deviation from his line of thinking.
To his way of thinking, voters are not eligible to exercise this basic right, for, once exercised in the case of direct air links, it might pave the way for the future independence of Taiwan. Ma is actually "consistent" in his attitude toward the referendum issue.
Rodgers' observation on the dichotomy between economics and politics provides a valuable lesson for Ma as well as President Chen Shui-bian (
Ma, by placing the economy above political reform, is blind to the fact that a sound political system may ensure long-term economic development.
Ma's ignorance of this fact again is rooted in the KMT's mistrust of the people -- the Taiwanese were told to keep mum about political issues, especially after the 228 Incident and during the White Terror era. The Taiwanese were trained to remain ignorant of politics and concentrate on making money.
The calmer the Taiwanese remained, the easier it was for the KMT to govern.
Rodgers' solution to the current political instability -- constitutional re-engineering -- may sound like common sense for most democratic countries, but it may probably trigger intense criticism from some people, the majority of whom come from the pan-blue camp. Any attempt made by the pan-green camp at revamping the Constitution is regarded by the pan-blue camp as an act tantamount to declaring Taiwan an independent nation.
Without giving proper attention to the legitimacy of the Constitution, Ma goes so far as to attempt to make connections between Taiwan and the Constitution, claiming that evidence indicates that a number of Taiwanese representatives did take an active part in the writing of the Constitution in the 1940s.
Whether the evidence is credible or not, it points to one simple fact -- the Constitution was not written for Taiwan. As such, it is only natural that the Taiwanese shouldn't be deprived of the right to choose a Constitution that meets the needs of the people. It is a sad fact that Ma is blind to this.
For Ma and the other pan-blue politicians, the choices in politics are not left to the people but to the so-called selected elite that works for the KMT regime.
Concerning Ma's leadership, he is far from being qualified to lead the way. He merely follows suit. He used to oppose such issues as the lifting of martial law, the abolition of the National Assembly and the direct popular presidential election. At present, he is opposed to the revision or rewriting of the Constitution.
Judging from Ma's recent remarks and conduct, it is quite difficult for me to place any trust in him, for I have no idea in what way he is going to lead Taiwan. Perhaps his recent interview with Newsweek says it all.
Still, it is my hope that Ma can give more thought to Taiwan's future without excluding any possible alternatives.
Frank Cheng
Tainan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath