The pair of cuddly panda bears hand-picked by the Chinese government as gifts for Taiwan have become a most effective propaganda tool in the war for hearts and minds. Chinese officials must be congratulating each other on a job well done, for they could never have hoped to create such fierce internal division in Taiwan by targeting the nation with missiles -- a tactic which is far more costly and also damaging to the image of the Chinese government.
The overwhelming success of the ploy was amply demonstrated by the press conference held by China's Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) on Friday. The event almost felt like a mixture of an Academy Awards ceremony and a Christmas party, with enthusiastic press coverage, suspense over which two lucky pandas had been picked from the list of finalists, distribution of souvenir pins, laughter and a generally festive atmosphere. Even TAO officials, usually notable only for their harsh comments about "Taiwan's splittist activities," reveled in the collective role of Santa Claus.
This naturally puts the Taiwanese government in an extremely embarrassing position. Obviously, a large segment -- if not a majority -- of the public would be sympathetic to the pan-blue argument that there can be no harm in accepting a pair of cuddly pandas.
Although the press conference held simultaneously by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Friday to condemn the gift as "unification propaganda" spoke the simple truth, it is inevitable that the MAC will be perceived as cold-hearted by a lot of people. Taiwan -- which is typically on the receiving end of Chinese abuse in the cross-strait relationship -- was seen to be the one dishing it out this time around.
One cannot help but feel that the government underestimated the "soft power" of the panda strategy and failed to carry out damage control. It is not as if they didn't have any warning.
Talk of China making Taiwan a gift of a pair of pandas as a symbol of "peace" and "unity" began during former Chinese Nationalist Party chairman Lien Chan's (
In all the excitement, a lot of people seem to have forgotten that even if the considerable political problem is somehow overlooked, accepting this gift is not as simple as it seems. Matters of Taiwanese and international law pertaining to the importing and exporting of endangered species cannot be ignored simply because the pandas are a gift from China. The public needs to be aware that these more mundane concerns -- not just the political ones -- could lead to the pandas being rejected. However, after the MAC's poorly orchestrated press conference on Friday, few may be willing to accept this.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS