In November, Beijing unveiled five mascots for the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. On Dec. 22, China's State Council Information Office published a white paper entitled China's Peaceful Development Road.
The message Beijing intended to convey with the mascots and the white paper was the promotion of a "peaceful rising" and the lack of hegemonic ambitions.
The two developments did not attract much attention in Taiwan, because it was still absorbed by domestic political bickering.
However, we should not underestimate their impact.
With China faring well on the economic front and modernizing its armed forces, other powers have become anxious.
Fueling their concern, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization last year broadened its membership to include Iran, India and Pakistan.
Elsewhere, China and Russia conducted their largest-ever joint military exercise in response to the eastward expansion of NATO and the US-Japan Security Treaty, as well as to counterbalance the wave of revolutions that swept across Eastern Europe last year.
China, Russia and a number of European nations and left-wing regimes in South America are dissatisfied with both the US and Britain and their attempts to promote what is criticized as "liberal imperialism" across the globe.
However, both the US and Japan have accused China of attempting to create an Asian Monroe Doctrine through ASEAN meetings.
Beijing's strategies, propaganda and actions have failed to dispel suspicion in regard to its ambitions, though these have at least delayed any direct confrontation in response.
On the economic front, China has also begun to expand its contributions to the world thanks to a booming economy and increased demand for imports. China is now not only the sixth-largest economy in the world but also the world's third-largest importer.
In the course of 10 years, China's domestic need for information technology, automobiles and telecom products will make it the world's biggest consumer market.
Capitalizing on its economic growth, China has signed procurement contracts with Australia, Canada and South American and African countries for large amounts of raw materials. China adopts a laissez-faire policy toward ASEAN nations by allowing them to enjoy a favorable balance of trade.
China's diplomatic and economic policy has encouraged more entrepreneurs from around the world to pour their capital into Brazil, Russia, India and China itself, a development that has led some academics to wonder if the "Beijing Consensus" will replace the "Washington Consensus." The head of the School of Oriental and African Studies in London has pointed out that China's thirst for raw materials is more beneficial to Africa than all of the efforts made by developed nations to write off that continent's debt.
In recent years, Beijing has realized that the US presence in Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia has discouraged Japan from enhancing its military capability as well as deterring North Korea from making any sudden moves.
Beijing has also sought to diminish the wariness of Southeast Asian nations and prevent nuclear proliferation in order to gain influence in the region.
On top of all of this, to maintain its grip on power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) must pursue political and economic reforms and stabilize its massive economic growth.
Some American political pundits are beginning to believe that China's rapid development will not necessarily challenge the US' dominant role in world affairs, and that in fact China may be able to assume more responsibility as a member of the international community.
The US continues to call the shots in world affairs while China continues to strengthen its hand. In other words, both liberal imperialism and regional hegemonism are taking what they need.
There are two problems that deserve our attention. First, although the conflict between regional hegemonies is unavoidable, China will be looking to put this scenario off for as long as possible.
Will Taiwan be able to maintain its opposition to Chinese encroachment?
In the face of Beijing's charm offensive, which it has maintained for more than 10 years, how much support will Taiwan be able to sustain with its insistence on a liberal democracy tinged with the influence of the Washington Consensus and claims that it is being oppressed?
Second, other than maintaining latitude in assessing China's economic development, the government should not underestimate China's potential for change.
If China attempts to link its development more closely to the rest of the world and does not seek to become a hegemony, then how will Taipei deal with this?
Chang Teng-chi is a doctoral candidate in political science at the University of Sheffield.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath