On Dec. 6 and Dec. 7, Tokyo was host to the International Conference on Human Rights and the Death Penalty, an event jointly organized by the American Bar Association, the Japanese Foundation of Bar Associations (JFBA) and the EU, and attended by representatives of groups from more than 20 countries.
I was there to represent the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty, an organization formed by a large number of Taiwanese interest groups, including the Judicial Reform Foundation, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and the Taipei Society.
During his address in the closing session, the chairperson of the JFBA made a few comments that left a deep impression on me.
He pointed out that among the democratic, advanced nations today, only the US, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan still have the death penalty.
He also said that some 90 percent of death sentences in the world were meted out by China's judiciary and that we share the burden of guilt for this travesty if we choose to just sit by and do nothing.
I made special note of the fact that he neglected to include Singapore among his list of "democratic" nations, but did include Taiwan.
After the conference finished, the British government, which funded the event, invited our government's envoy from the Ministry of Justice to attend a meeting with the representatives of the other nations, all expenses paid.
The envoy, a soft-spoken prosecutor surnamed Chu, told the meeting in impeccable English that Taiwan's government was sparing no effort in pursuing the abolition of capital punishment.
He told them that the number of death sentences meted out by Taiwanese judges was decreasing every year and that the only death sentence now on the books was being commuted as part of the government's policy to phase out capital punishment.
In other words, we were seeing the gradual fulfillment of one of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) policy promises: the abolition of capital punishment.
It was a moment to make one proud. But I didn't feel all that elated.
The reason? Taiwanese brothers Lin Meng-kai (
According to newspaper reports, the reason that the Ministry of Justice had allowed this sentence to proceed was because "the Lin brothers failed to show remorse" and "there was in fact no good reason to save their lives."
They added that "this notwithstanding, the Ministry of Justice remains committed to pursuing the abolition of capital punishment."
I feel it necessary to address Minister of Justice Morley Shih (
Minister, if you are really committed to ending the death penalty, you have to understand that capital punishment, whether it is retained or abolished, is not about individual cases.
It represents the degree to which a nation respects human life.
Also, capital punishment has nothing to do with rehabilitating offenders through making them feel remorse as a condition of mercy.
Nor has it proved to be an effective deterrent.
If Shih truly believes punishment has a positive social goal, then I think it is eminently possible to "find a reason to save" the lives of convicts facing the death sentence.
Wu Hao-jen is president of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China