I have read the article by Mr. Frits Bolkestein ("What's wrong with Turkey?", Dec. 12, page 9).
The answer to the question in the title is "There is nothing wrong with Turkey, but it seems that there might be something wrong with the author of the article."
First of all, anybody who tries to pass judgement on the relations of Turkey with the EU must have at least a basic knowledge of the country. Mr. Bolkestein, while trying in his article to sound like an expert, cannot hide his ignorance and seems to be confused as to the capital of Turkey as he refers to the Turkish government as "The Istanbul government." His confusion does not end there. While criticizing members of the Turkish Government for being intolerant, he refers to an incident which took place in Copenhagen. Contrary to Mr. Bolkestein's claim, it was the Turkish Prime Minister Mr. Tayyip Erdogan -- and not Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul -- who walked out of a press conference at which a reporter from a Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK)-linked TV station was present. (Readers should be aware that the PKK organization has been responsible for the loss of some 30,000 innocent lives in Turkey.)
Mr. Bolkestein, while trying to justify his objection to Turkey's admission to the EU by accusing the former of lacking democracy, forgets that in a democratic country the judiciary is independent and acts in line with the laws of the country. Therefore, if an individual -- or in this case, Orhan Pamuk -- breaks the law then he has to face the consequences. The Turkish courts should not be asked to drop charges against a person just because he is a popular author in Europe. By the way, Mr. Pamuk's court hearing has not even started yet.
Reading the article one should not mistakenly believe that Mr. Bolkestein is opposing Turkey's admission on the grounds of democracy, freedom of speech or tolerance. The real source of his opposition is obvious when he writes that Turkey is not a Christian country.
If Mr. Bolkestein truly believes that religion is the main obstacle to membership in the EU then one could argue that his approach is not much different from the racist attitude that brought great disaster to Europe in the past.
Certainly, his approach is not in line with the realities of the 21st century.
Burak Gursel
Representative, Turkish Trade Office
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with