Ma should pass arms bill
The "three-in-one" elections have just come to an end. Under the leadership of Ma Ying-jeou (
Therefore, I suggest that Ma focus on the predicament of the special arms procurement package and the confirmation of the Control Yuan members to show his sincerity. Especially as the chances of him winning the 2008 presidential election are high. At present, he should pay more attention to national security, monitoring of the ruling party and showing some concern for the livelihoods of all the nation's people.
Ma's rational nature gives people the impression that he is cool-headed. But if he carries on following the KMT's previous path of blocking the arms deal and stubbornly boycotting military procurement, he may in fact end up giving the opposite impression.
Moreover, if one day he is elected president and suddenly realizes that national security is a key issue to Taiwan's survival and that he should transcend partisan politics, he will be faced with the need to boost national defense capabilities. By the time he plans to increase the arms budget, he too may receive severe criticism from opposition parties.
In fact, it would be more pragmatic for Ma to allow the arms bill to pass to the approp-riate legislative committee. Then he can invite academics and professionals to rationally discuss the issue at hearings. After a cautious evaluation and review, legislators can then decide whether or not to buy the arms, or which specific items to buy. To do so, I believe, would show a responsible attitude and it would repay the faith of the people in Taiwan who supported his party in the recent elections.
Chang Juinxiong
Taichung
Non-voters the loser
A shifting political climate is the cornerstone of a functioning democracy. Resting on the laurels of past achievements leads to decay and other unworthy pursuits.
The Democratic Progressive Party received a wake-up call. The KMT did not receive a mandate to sell Taiwan to China. It merely received another chance to govern the people of Taiwan.
Now is a chance for more dialogue on where Taiwan wants to go. Along with the older dialogue about who and what Taiwan is, Taiwanese now have yet another chance in a free society to define themselves for the future.
Those who didn't vote are the real losers in this important election. They have already shown a lack of desire to be individual citizens and let others decide their fate. Inaction may be a quality trait for certain religious values but in society it is a formula for disaster.
Bill Parkhurst
California
Judiciary a joke
It is pathetic that the prosecutor-general would discount democracy, even after criminals have been elected ("Election results irk prosecutors," Dec. 6, page 2). The 10 corrupt local council and town chiefs that were elected are but the tip of the iceberg. For one cockroach seen there are 10 unseen.
It is not democracy that is at fault. Rather, it is the system where the vote-buyer gets elected, and after he assumes office is able to profit from his position and pay back his cronies, all the while going unpunished.
As the profits build up -- like the KMT's illegally gained assets, and the 18 percent preferential interest rates that reward its cronies, they are then able to buy more votes. It is the totally incompetent judiciary that is unable to punish them and prevent them from doing this that is at fault.
These "folk heros" of assorted criminals are seen as the win-ners of a dirty game, as they are able to beat the system.
Not to mention KMT Chairman Ma, who was a KMT student spy at Harvard, who sells illegal party assets as chairman, who discards the Republic of China (ROC) flag in Taiwan, and who then is admired by "ROC" compatriots because he can continue to buy votes, win elections and profit from his cronies.
The double standards of treatment for pan-blue and pan-green politicians, as witnessed in the court summons for former president Lee Teng-hui (
A judiciary that allows it to erode democracy, and then jokingly calls itself an "independent judiciary," is all deeply disappointing for pan-green voters.
Have faith in democracy and yourself. Don't let this dirty game continue in Taiwan.
Chen Ming-Chung
Chicago, Illinois
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath