Some say that politics is just clever deceit. If we examine the campaign promises of the two political camps during the Super Sunday election rallies this past weekend, it's apparent that both the blue and green camps are engaged in political trickery. Their slogans simply address problems that have been forced into the light by the media. Neither political camp understands its own failings, but have gone all out to attack those of their opponents.
It is difficult to know whether to laugh or cry.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), led by Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the slogan "Oppose corruption, save Taiwan," called on hundreds of thousands of people to protest against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government in Taipei.
Certainly, the high-profile Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corp scandal is indicative of corruption within the DPP. But until the KMT returns to the public all the assets it stole, it has little grounds to criticize others for corruption.
The KMT could have more effectively attacked the DPP by highlighting the government's poor performance. Instead, Ma has blurred the focus by choosing "anti-corruption" as the main campaign issue. This only serves as a reminder of the KMT's outrageous corruption in the past and may even scare moderate voters away.
Similarly, the DPP's call to "Uphold reform, defend Taiwan" is an empty slogan. President Chen Shui-bian (
Apparently the DPP does not regard the promises it makes to the people as being of any importance -- there has been virtually no movement on judicial reform, cross-strait policy is an unpredictable rollercoaster ride and education reform remains stalled. Only now, faced with an election, has the government started to affirm the need for change, using any sensational slogan that comes to hand in an effort to attract votes.
This kind of political opportunism is at the root of the DPP's inconsistency and its inability to keep the faith of the electorate. Green-camp supporters can find no convincing explanations for the government's actions. It is no surprise then that they lack enthusiasm toward the current round of elections.
Taiwan's elections give the impression that they exist to benefit individuals, not the nation, because electoral tactics have not developed much beyond the smear campaigns and revelations of malfeasance -- including vote buying -- used during the martial law period. Little effort is made to focus on a party's policies, either at the local or central level.
Starting with this election, voters, whether they support the green or the blue camp, should cast their ballots for candidates whose policies they believe are the best. They must pressure candidates into making good on their promises, rather than being influenced by the antics of a small number of political superstars.
If voters continue to consider only ideology, this will only encourage politicians to promise whatever is necessary to appeal to voters in the excitement of an election campaign -- without any consideration for the consequences.
When politicians think they can escape responsibility for their electoral promises, it is the voters that ultimately suffer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath