News of suicides appears steadily, and reports about famous people killing themselves in particular often send shock waves through society. I wonder if the public has noticed any difference in the way these reports have been handled over the last couple of years compared with five or 10 years ago. In the last couple of years, journalists have added analyses and suggestions from experts and other information to their reports.
The same principle that is valid for information about other health education issues also holds true for suicide prevention. The best and most efficient way to disseminate it is not through producing huge amounts of printed matter or by purchasing airtime on TV or the radio, but rather through finding ways to turn it into information that citizens can access any time they want, making it a part of everyday life. Over the past few years, the media have become partners of the government and experts in the suicide prevention effort. This is a great leap forward for both the media and our society, and the fruit of the labors of experts and government officials at every level.
Following the 921 earthquake in 1999, I participated in the post-disaster psychological rehabilitation and suicide prevention process. Within a week of the quake, the Department of Health (DOH) had set up 22 psychologist teams in the immediate disaster area. In June the following year, two community centers for psychological care were set up, in Taichung and Nantou.
Before the earthquake struck, the suicide rate in Nantou County was already one of the highest in Taiwan. In 1999, 16.7 people per 100,000 committed suicide, and two years after the earthquake that figure had risen to 22.9 per 100,000. But since the suicide prevention network (自殺防治關懷網) began to operate, the figures have fallen every year, declining to 17.9 per 100,000 last year.
Contrary to what some critics have said, the staff do not sit around in air-conditioned offices. They visit each of the 500 referred cases of attempted suicide they accept each year, and arrange referrals so people can gain access social and economic resources. The health bureaus, public health nurses, social workers, home-support centers, education bureaus, schools, village and borough heads, agricultural bureaus, labor bureaus, civil and religious organizations, and the media that are part of the network have held more than 1,100 meetings in communities and schools over the past five years. They have checked the psychological health of more than 50,000 people.
Just like many other people and civic organizations in this line of work, I often complain that the government offers too few resources, that many budget proposals are cut and that reviews are too slow, all sources of great concern among those of us working at the grassroots level. But looking back, we can see that prior to the 921 earthquake, the focus was on treating patients with severe mental problems. After the earthquake, however, the government and health experts have placed a greater focus on trauma psychology and suicide prevention.
I often think that rather than complaining, we should highlight the bright spots within our community. As resources will always be in short supply, we should decide the best way to use the resources we do have. The fact that the financially strapped government has been able to pay attention to suicide and psychological health issues is a great leap forward. But suicide prevention cannot rely on experts alone, it requires everyone to get involved. The most important thing is for each of us show those near and dear to us that we care.
Cheng Juo-se is the vice president of Bali Mental Hospital in Taipei County.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath