Russian President Vladimir Putin makes an unlikely swinger. Until now, he has been assiduously courting China. He sells Beijing oil and weaponry. Bilateral trade will be worth about US$27 billion this year.
Cold war border disputes have been settled. The two countries recently held unprecedented joint military exercises. And they often act together at the UN on issues such as Iran and Sudan.
Yet risking accusations of infidelity from Beijing, Putin has spent the past three days in Japan, China's old enemy and regional rival and a country with which Russia is technically still at war. He promised to build a pipeline linking Japan to Siberia's oil. He encouraged further investment in Russia. And he was conciliatory over the hot-button issue of the Kurile islands, known in Japan as the Northern Territories, seized by the Soviet Union in 1945 and which Tokyo wants back.
"We will be doing everything possible to solve this problem," Putin said. "We are fully determined to work to solve all the issues we face." He even listened with apparent equanimity as Japan's Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi urged Russia to handle weapons exports to China "in a careful manner."
Putin's two-timing in Tokyo was all the more remarkable given Japan's relative weakness, said Christopher Hughes, a regional expert at the University of Warwick.
"At the end of the Cold War, Russia was on the slide and Japan was on the up. But the tables have turned," he said.
"Japan faces a major economic rival in China that to some extent is outplaying Japan in regional diplomacy and energy acquisition. It needs another big power to balance against China alongside its alliance with the US That's why it's put the islands dispute on the back-burner."
Similar calculations may lie behind Putin's placatory stance. He obtained specific rewards, such as Japanese backing for Moscow's bid for membership of the WTO. But longer-term concerns about becoming dependent on China's markets or being victimized by its strategic designs may also have prompted him to hedge his bets.
"Russia is very weak in the Far East. It has almost no military presence there," Hughes said.
Some analysts suggest resource-rich, thinly populated Siberia could one day prove a tempting target for expanding China.
Similar worries also help explain regionally unloved Japan's tightening embrace of the US, underscored by the visit of US President George W. Bush last week. Undecided whether China's rise is a threat or an opportunity, uneasy over its threats against Taiwan and deeply wary of North Korea, Washington is reinforcing relationships across Asia, notably with India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Vietnam and Mongolia.
But Japan remains the linchpin of its regional strategy and, increasingly, of its forward defense. Bush called it "a vital relationship."
Plans to station a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier taskforce, operational commands, and the US Army 1st Corps' rapid reaction force in Japan were agreed last month.
"The security environment in the western Pacific increasingly requires that the US Navy station the most capable ships in forward-deployed positions," Admiral James Kelly said. "This posture brings ... the greatest amount of striking power, if necessary, in the timeliest manner to any regional crisis."
Like its embrace of Russia, US advances carry risks for Japan. It has already been sucked into Washington's wider agenda in Iraq, Afghanistan and the "war on terror." US bases and missile sales remain controversial. And the assertiveness encouraged by Washington is fueling nationalist sentiment. But its position on the edge of a world increasingly dominated by Beijing is lonely.
"We need the US," one diplomat said. "What can we do? We have no choice."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath