In response to the recent discussion regarding work permit laws: One important issue for many foreigners in Taiwan that has yet to be mentioned is "the work rights of foreign spouses."
According to Article 48 of the Employment Services Act (ESA;
At the same time it must be pointed out that the Council of Labor Affairs is the central government agency in charge of work permit matters, and in overseeing the implementation of the ESA.
The original intent of this "foreign spouse" legislation, according to the comments of legislators and council officials in the original June 2000 public hearing at the Legislative Yuan, was to give foreign spouses work rights which are equivalent to those enjoyed by Taiwanese citizens. The foreign spouse advocacy groups in Taiwan had been pushing for this for several years, since, [according to their logic] "We are making money in order to support a Taiwanese spouse, so why should we be limited in the type of work we can do, or specific terms of employment, or any other restrictions?"
The Legislative Yuan mem-bers finally agreed to this reasoning. Unfortunately, at present, a large number of city and county government agencies do not respect the terms of ESA Article 48 in practice.
A good example is in the situation of private teaching academies [language institutes], kindergartens, toddler schools, or even various types of small companies or shops. Again, according to the ESA, if it is legal for a Taiwanese person to be hired and work there, then according to ESA Article 48, a foreign spouse [with a resident visa based on marriage to a Taiwanese citizen] may also be employed there, and they do not need a work permit. At the same time, the "foreign spouse" may also have multiple jobs, whether full or part-time.
I have consistently heard stories over the past few years of local city and county government agencies requiring foreign spouses to obtain work permits in order to work in education or other fields, and have also heard that labor insurance could not be applied for or other government paperwork could not be processed if a work permit was not received.
City and county government officers have also stated that certain categories of work are "off limits" to foreign spouses. Naturally, the majority of local employers are not eager to argue with city and county government agencies, and so this state of affairs continues to exist.
To my knowledge, in the last few years there have been many foreign spouses who have left Taiwan with their families precisely because of this reason, ie, they were unable to obtain "unrestricted work rights" from local city and county government agencies, and hence had a hard time making enough money to support their families.
However, as stated above, the council is the central government agency in charge of work permit matters. If the ESA says that "foreign spouses" do not need a work permit, then they don't need a work permit, and local government agencies have no authority to say otherwise.
If possible, I would hope that the Taipei Times could clarify this matter for the benefit of its readers.
I would also hope that the council would issue the appropriate instructions to all local government agencies to educate them on the content of ESA Article 48.
Name provided
Taipei
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS