A year after Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudoyono came to power vowing to fight Indonesia's rampant corruption, more needs to be done to bring the main perpetrators to justice, observers and analysts say.
"After a year of SBY's [Yudhoyono's] government, the big corruptors are still on the loose," Indonesia's weekly Tempo magazine said in a recent issue. "Corruption in this nation has reached nauseating and critical proportions."
According to a report last Tuesday by Berlin-based corruption watchdog Transparency International, things are improving in Indonesia, but only marginally.
Last year Indonesia scored 2 out of 10, with 10 denoting the least corrupt nation. A year later it managed a slightly better 2.2, but was still ranked 137th out of the 159 countries surveyed, near Ethiopia and Iraq.
Bribery is seen as commonplace in Indonesia. Judges are often bought off and the country's massive bureaucracy is riddled with layers of corruption involving endless backhanders.
"Yudhoyono has made some progress but mostly [it has been] symbolic," said Endy Bayuni, chief editor of the Jakarta Post.
Corruption plagues government reform and financial institutions and scares off much-needed foreign investment.
"Corruption is still a big problem here," Finnish Minister of Foreign Trade and Development Mari Johanna Kiviniemi said last week in Jakarta.
"I think it is one of the biggest obstacles for Finnish companies to invest here," she told the Jakarta Post. "In that sense, the Indonesian government still has a lot of work to do. It is not enough to just have policies. The government should also have the determination to implement them in practice."
Yudhoyono, who portrayed himself as a man of integrity in last year's election campaign, had promised "the fight against corruption is a top priority for my government in the next five years."
He boosted the powers of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), which achieved a notable success when it jailed former Aceh governor Abudullah Puteh in April for buying a helicopter with state funds.
But Taufiequrachman Ruki, who heads the KPK, is the first to admit that the anti-corruption drive is in a mess and he lays the blame squarely at the door of corrupt government institutions.
"Legislation and law enforcement continue to be in a shambles," Ruki told a press conference last Tuesday. "KPK has not seen any clear move to get rid of corruption in government institutions."
"Corruption is not seen as the common enemy. KPK is seen as the common enemy," he said.
More and more high-profile corruption cases have surfaced in recent months, splitting opinion between those who see them as evidence the authorities are clamping down, and others who fear they only show what little is being achieved.
"Eradicating corruption will never work without first reforming the bureaucracy," Danang Widoyoko, the deputy coordinator of Indonesia Corruption Watch was quoted as saying in the Jakarta Post. "A general and integrated strategy to combat corruption must be implemented simultaneously, and it is very important that the president himself monitor this implementation."
Currently, two big corruption cases are making their way through the courts.
Three former executives of Indonesia's largest state bank are on trial for corruption involving 160 billion rupiah (US$15.9 million) and could face life jail terms if convicted.
The second case involves a former religious affairs minister who is accused of misusing millions of dollars in funds collected from Muslim hajj pilgrims.
But these represent only the tip of a very large iceberg and Yudhoyono's so far enduring popularity will soon plummet if more action is not taken to stamp out corruption, especially in government institutions, analysts said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath