Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi outraged China and other Asian nations on Monday by paying another controversial visit to the Yasukuni war shrine seen by critics as a symbol of Tokyo's wartime aggression.
Koizumi said on Wednesday that he did not accept the argument that relations with China and South Korea would be fine if he stopped visiting the shrine.
"The issues with China and Japan-China relations are not confined to Yasukuni," he said in a parliamentary debate.
"Relations and interdependencies have been deepening in various areas," he said. "I will make efforts to gain an understanding from China and South Korea."
South Korean Foreign Minister Ban Ki-Moon said on Wednesday he had put on hold a planned trip to Japan in protest over the visit to Yasukuni, which honors 2.5 million Japanese war dead including some war criminals from World War II.
And China on Tuesday cancelled Japanese Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machimura's planned visit to Beijing.
Analysts say the latest friction has put a spotlight on fierce rivalry between Tokyo and Beijing that has intensified as China's economy booms while Japan struggles to break out of a decade of economic stagnation.
"The two countries are always stressing the need for cooperation and dialogue," said Masahiro Wakabayashi, professor of international politics and East Asian affairs at Tokyo University.
"But in reality they are not willing to yield an inch as they are racing for Asia's leadership," Wakabayashi said. "I'm afraid that frictions between the two countries are likely to grow for the time being."
Analysts warned the latest row may spread to other conflicts between the two countries, including talks on a contested gas field in the East China Sea.
On the region's security front, Japan irked Beijing late last year by joining the US in pointing out China's increasing defense spending and tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
Japan had previously been reluctant to address the issue directly for fear of angering its powerful neighbor, a major trading partner.
Confrontation also surfaced as China led a campaign against Japan's fading bid to win a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
"[The Chinese] have already won in the sense that the announcement of the United Nations Security Council seat has been postponed," said Gilles Guiheux, director of the French Centre for Research on Contemporary China in Hong Kong.
However, analysts also note that both China and Japan have their problems.
"For China, the political system -- the Communist control -- is the bottleneck," Wakabayashi said. "How China can manage to expand itself under its political system is always questioned."
For Japan, winning Asia's understanding for its sincere apology for wartime aggression is a prerequisite for regional leadership, said Kaoru Okano, professor of politics at Meiji University in Tokyo.
"But Prime Minister Koizumi has failed to make an effort to win Asia's understanding," Okano said. "If Koizumi's successor follows suit, Asian countries will continue turning their back."
But analysts see little chance of massive demonstrations in China like those seen earlier this year against the approval by Tokyo of a Japanese history textbook that Beijing said downplayed Japan's past atrocities as well as Japan's bid for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
"Do they really want to scare the tens of thousands of Japanese in Shanghai? Part of the Shanghai economy depends on Japanese investment, something like 10 percent or even more," Guiheux said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with