The world is now on guard against avian flu. It first reared its ugly head in Hong Kong, Vietnam and Thailand, and has since made an appearance in Romania and Turkey in Europe, with one case even reported in Greece. This has caused considerable anxiety in the EU, and Europe's governments are trying to devise a way to halt its spread.
Avian flu is a new viral strain to which humans have yet to develop antibodies and its high fatality rate has prompted concern in the medical community. The virus has yet to make itself felt in Taiwan, but a degree of panic is starting to take hold: Anxiety over the virus caused the stock market to fall over 130 points on Monday and yesterday.
October is the migratory season for birds. In the past, these visitors have been welcomed, and in many places around the island special events are held to celebrate their arrival. This year, however, these migratory birds are likely to be seen as carriers of danger rather than welcome guests.
As early as Aug. 19, the National Security Council met to discuss how to cope with the threat, pledging NT$20 billion (US$594 million) toward prevention. Additionally, hospitals have adopted preventative measures, as they did during the 2003 outbreak of SARS.
The Center for Disease Control (疾病管制局), meanwhile, has approached the Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche concerning joint production of Tamiflu, the leading drug against avian flu.
The public has cause for alarm, but should not panic.
Although the government is already preparing to tackle a potential pandemic, a recent CDC survey showed that while 90 percent of Taiwanese had heard of avian flu, around 80 percent did not have a clue how to deal with it.
The general public are not sufficiently informed on how to protect themselves.
What's worse, the recent spate of news coverage will likely only make people more nervous. The Department of Health and the media should work together to educate the public on how to fight the flu.
Given that it is impossible to quarantine all of the birds entering Taiwan, the public should avoid contact with them to reduce the chances of transmission. The Department of Health should continue to strengthen entry and customs inspections and maintain fever checkpoints at airports.
In addition, the government should warn the public not to get close to, touch or feed any birds, and people should report any cases of fever to the health authorities immediately.
Taiwanese, like everyone else in the world, are concerned about the spread of this disease. But as Taiwan is not a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) -- because of China's incessant political interference -- it is excluded from the global disease prevention and control network. As a result, it can only seek help indirectly from other WHO member nations. This makes a mockery of the WHO's humanitarian and sans frontier claims. It also poses a threat to the Taiwanese population, and leaves open a loophole in the international public health network.
Whether looked at from the perspective of Taiwan's basic rights to healthcare or global disease prevention, we can never allow the nightmare of our near-solitary fight against the SARS epidemic in 2003 to happen again.
Instead, the WHO should accept Taiwan's application to become an observer nation. Human lives must be put before politics.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing