How scary is bird flu? Is it, as Mike Davis, the author of The Monster at Our Door, puts it, a "viral asteroid on a collision course with humanity?" Or are the it's-not-if-but-when predictions overblown?
Last Sunday the chief medical officer for England and Wales, Sir Liam Donaldson, said that the strain of bird flu might not hit Britain this winter, but that it would reach these shores sometime soon. Having stood in the same ward as a Vietnamese man with bird flu in February, and having just visited Ceamurlia de Jos, site of the latest outbreak in Romania, I think Sir Liam's cautious warning is justified. H5N1 -- or GenZ as the current superstrain is called -- really is a monster of a virus. Chickens infected with GenZ don't just die, they melt, leaching blood from every organ.
In people, the pathology has not been anything like so extreme. But flu textbooks say humans shouldn't be able to be catch an avian virus such as H5N1 at all -- at least not before it has infected an intermediary animal. Moreover, while about 100 people worldwide have contracted GenZ since it first emerged in Hong Kong in 1997, 60 of them have died -- a worryingly high mortality rate.
That's not all. Intensive chicken farming, combined with fast-rising Southeast Asian populations and international jet travel, has created what one epidemiologist calls a "perfect virological storm."
What could this mean for you or me? A few weeks ago, David Nabarro, the UN's influenza coordinator, came up with a global death toll of 150 million. The World Health Organization (WHO) quickly offered a rebuttal, saying the correct figure was 2 to 7.4 million. But as the WHO well knows, the only true predictor is what happened in 1918.
Then, as now, an avian virus suddenly acquired the ability to latch on to and invade human lung cells. The difference is that the Spanish flu -- so-called because Spain was the only country not to censor news of the illness -- was also highly infectious between humans.
Scientists now estimate that the 1918 pandemic may have killed 40 to 100 million people worldwide. If you take into account the current world population, a direct extrapolation gives you 325 million deaths.
If that's not sufficiently scary, there's more. Epidemiologists estimate the 1918 virus killed 2.5 percent of those infected. But we know that GenZ kills 70 percent of the people it infects.
In other words, the true worst-case scenario based on 1918 could be 1 billion deaths worldwide. This is what Davis means by the monster at our door and why he believes scientists, and the press, are right to sound the alarm.
Then again, it may never happen. Flu is one of the deadliest pathogens in nature's arsenal, but is also one of the sloppiest. Like all viruses, every time it replicates it makes mistakes, some of which may render it less infective. That is the conundrum of H5N1. It could be a huge threat to the human race or none at all.
Moreover, just as global trade now threatens to bring the virus to Europe, so better surveillance by the WHO and World Animal Health Organization means we know the instant a Romanian or Turkish chicken falls ill. It may make for lurid reading, but in the case of H5N1, forewarned is forearmed.
Finally, politicians are belatedly listening. US President George W. Bush's reading list this summer included John Barry's The Great Influenza, the authoritative work on the 1918 pandemic. And in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, he has followed the lead of other governments by increasing stockpiles of Tamiflu, an anti-retroviral drug unavailable in 1918.
So be afraid, but remember that no one understands H5N1 well enough to say what will happen. And, fingers crossed, it never may.
Mark Honigsbaum is the author of The Fever Trail: In Search of the Cure for Malaria.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing