President Chen Shui-bian (
Chiang Kai-shek (
Taiwan cannot live without diplomatic allies. Without them, it would become so isolated as to give legitimacy to China's claim of sovereignty. Without international support, no one will come to Taiwan's aid if China invades on the pretext that it is putting an end to a civil war. National security considerations therefore dictate that the president and vice president must spare no effort in visiting our diplomatic allies in Africa, Central America and the Caribbean as part of the nation's ongoing diplomatic battle with China.
In the current situation, the use of economic aid to support our diplomatic allies is unavoidable. This is not simply through the gift of money. For example, in the past, Taiwan dispatched agricultural delegations to help diplomatic allies, with excellent results. This is an obvious example of creating a diplomatic win-win situation. As to the "Jung Pang (
The time the president and vice-president consume in making these visits is not really an issue. The problem is that a small number of pan-blue politicians and members of the pro-unification media are constantly trying to pull the president down. They even go so far as to report on confidential aspects of the trip, totally disregarding the interests of the nation and serving as informers for China. Some shameless politicians have even described the government's "Jung Pang " project as being "extravagant diplomacy" -- as if the government is following in the footsteps of the Chinese National Party (KMT) regime, which knew no other way of conducting diplomacy than providing fat kickbacks for foreign politicians. They did not even consider the possibility of creating a diplomatic and commercial policy that could result in a win-win situation for both countries. These pan-blue politicians are both hateful and pathetic.
Before such politicians come out with allegations of "extravagant diplomacy," they should give some thought to the KMT's past diplomatic strategies, and to who created Taiwan's present-day international isolation. Having said that, it is necessary for the DPP to ensure the success of the "Jung Pang" project, winning the acknowledgement of both the governing and opposition parties and thereby breaking the grip that China exerts on Taiwan's diplomatic efforts.
Only then can these presidential trips be considered worthwhile.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath