Maybe Premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) really is a seer and was able to predict the current awkward political situation.
Before the new legislative session began on Tuesday, he had already taken the example of Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to heart and requested that the pan-blue camp, if it didn't support the Cabinet's flood control bill, overturn the government with a vote of no confidence and let President Chen Shui-bian (
That Hsieh was blocked from delivering his policy report as scheduled on the legislative session's opening day shows he is an intelligent, far-sighted politician, albeit not clever enough to find a way out of his predicament. Instead, he sat there silently, like a character out of a Hemingway novel, waiting unhurried until the bitter end.
The call to dissolve the legislature is of course merely words and not a well thought out political plan. Since a new election would carry potentially high costs for incumbents, lawmakers from both the blue and green camps are unwilling to follow through on the call. And even if an election were to result in the pan-blue camp retaining its majority, it is still not certain that Chen would let them form a Cabinet, since the legislature no longer has the right to approve the premier. Here is why: Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
It is this constitutional shortcoming that has led to the past few years of political deadlock. The governing party's minority in the legislature dictated the development of the conflicts over both the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant four years ago and last year's clash over the 319 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute. Although the opposition tried to use the legislature to manipulate the shooting investigation issue, executive power remains in the hands of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
The outcome, when the opposition forced the issue, was the unconstitutional and unworkable 319 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute. Faced with the opposition's obstruction, the DPP has been unable to move issues such as the arms purchase, the flood control bill or the right to approve Control Yuan members out of the Procedure Committee and have them passed into law.
Nor is it able to dissolve the legislature and put the issue to the public. This situation has created a political problem that is impacting the people of Taiwan and has become symbolic of the government's inability rule.
In fact, Chen cannot take the initiative to dissolve the legislature. Nor does the legislature have the right to ratify the appointment of the premier. Although the administration has been hampered by the pan-blue camp majority, it is really no more than harassment of the executive.
But the pan-blue camp remains in high spirits as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
This is probably why pan-blue legislators seem to have lost all sense of restraint. Even the sensible Ma seems pleased about their ridiculous performance, while the general public does not even seem to be bothered by the farce.
The political impasse has led to endless conflicts, and with the politicians acting so willfully, the people have realized they can no longer count on politicians to look after their interests. This is a clear example of how the Constitution has succumbed to politics; whether it is the pan-blues undermining the government or the pan-greens reacting fiercely, the model is one of party-to-party confrontation. It is this that has led to a stalemate over the past five years that has hurt both sides grievously.
Even if the public has decided to unseat the government, it will have to wait until 2008 when the next presidential elections are held. By then, will Taiwan's democracy have degenerated into that of a banana republic? This is not a prophecy of doom, but rather a rational prediction of the ugly fate that awaits Taiwan if the present situation persists.
In fact, most people in Taiwan have become disillusioned with the political parties and politicians of both sides. But they can't envision any changes to the current situation. They also tend to look askance at so-called constitutional reform, as they are aware that no politician has a blueprint for reform that goes beyond the immediate concerns of the 2008 presidential election.
The nation has reached a crossroads. It is the pessimistic yet sensible Taiwanese people rather than the selfish politicians that have to decide if they want to shake off this predicament. Whether it is by punishing parties in the year-end mayoral and county commissioner elections, or through a grassroots constitutional movement, it is necessary for the people to find a constitutional framework to keep the two parties in line. This will be the greatest challenge to Taiwan's democracy.
Hsu Yung-ming is a research fellow at the Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON AND DANIEL CHENG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing