Now that former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) smoothed the way for China's "united front" strategy, Beijing has made repeated forays against Taiwan. It has attacked from the outside, supported by the pan-blue fifth column inside Taiwan, who are delighted by the vicious strategy. It is amazing that the blue camp's inability to separate friend from enemy has reached such an absurd level.
Recently, China's offer of tariff-free access to imported fruit from Taiwan was nothing more than an attack disguised as a gift. But the pan-blue camp actually did much of the spade work for Beijing, even creating conflict between fruit farmers and the government. Following the visits by the two pan-blue leaders, other blue-camp legislators have made numerous trips to China, eagerly building a platform for cooperation.
Even though China has about 700 missiles directed at Taiwan, the blue camp continues to block the arms procurement bill and, indifferent to the growing imbalance in military strength across the Strait, they have instead set out to make friends with the enemy. This is not about "connecting with Taiwan," but is simply selling out Taiwan.
Recently, the blue camp has hardened its heart to any kind of ploy to "connect with China." Lien's and Soong's pilgrimages have furthermore achieved another result in encouraging Taiwanese students to study in China, building up a future generation of pro-China supporters, much in the same way as Lien's grandfather sent his father to the "homeland" to study.
The fact that Beijing gives preferential treatment to Taiwanese students is just another aspect of their "united front" strategy. After all, China has been emphasizing the importance of bringing young Taiwanese people over to the "motherland" for more than a decade.
Cultural and educational exchanges exactly meet the needs of China's "united front" strategy. Beijing has always emphasized student recruitment, which to all intents and purposes is allowing students to pay for their own brainwashing. After a few years of this, they become "pure Chinese," so it is hardly a surprise that China's leaders have been so generous in offering scholarships.
Both former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) have insisted on Taiwan not recognizing Chinese degrees. There is a simple reason for this, and that is that once Chinese degrees are accepted, many Taiwanese universities will have to close their doors and many teachers will lose their jobs. Even the issue of their national identity will become a problem for the younger generation. Only pan-blue politicians with ulterior motives continue to encourage Taiwanese students to embark on their "journey to the West," which may very well result in our next generation calling our enemy's country home.
China, on the other hand, is not at all afraid that Taiwan may see through its ploy. Chinese officials have openly admitted that enrolling Taiwanese students in Chinese schools is part of its overall goal of unifying the motherland, and that the issue must be understood from the vantage point of unification. This makes it clear that the idea of separating politics from education remains an illusion in China. For the authorities in Beijing, education is an opportunity to disseminate ideology.
The Chinese government has clearly instructed teachers at all levels not to see the enrollment of Taiwanese students as strictly an educational issue. The main point of this approach is that accepting Taiwanese students and giving them a Chinese education will increase these students' understanding of China and make them agree with unification. Simply put, they want Taiwanese students to willingly travel to China to be brainwashed.
China's "united front" strategy has not overlooked Taiwanese workers either. China has found various excuses to extend free invitations to cadres from Taiwan's labor unions. Taiwanese workers have felt the hardship of unemployment as a result of large parts of Taiwan's industry setting up shop in China, so when labor union cadres go to China, they are little better than scab labor.
The reason why the KMT was routed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the past was because the CCP so effectively used its "united front" strategy on workers, farmers and students. The take-over of Hong Kong also taught China a new trick -- to co-opt political and business circles. In dealing with Taiwan, Beijing is putting a combination of the tactics they used against the KMT and in Hong Kong to good use, and Taiwan must tread very carefully.
The effect of China's united front strategy on Taiwanese students is far-reaching. The government must not on any condition accept Chinese degrees and open the door for students to go to China. The government cannot be unaware that the so-called cross-strait educational and cultural exchange long ago deteriorated to become part of China's "united front" strategy. The most important thing in avoiding our young students becoming guinea pigs in China's "united front laboratory" is of course to improve the domestic educational and employment situation.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew and Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath