While we in the West are preoccupied with cloning sheep, pigs, dogs and, of course, ourselves, scientists in the developing world are focused on an organism of far greater importance: rice. According to a Chinese saying, "the most precious things are not jade and pearls, but the five grains." Earlier this month the genome of one of those five grains was laid bare when the complete genome sequence of rice was published in the journal Nature.
Rice is the staple food crop for 3 billion people, mostly in Asia. But most of those dependent on the crop still go hungry. About 800 million people don't have enough to eat, many of them children, and about 5 million will die of diseases related to malnutrition.
And with the world's population increasing at a rate of about 86 million people a year, things could get a lot worse. It is estimated that rice production will have to increase by about 30 percent in the next 20 years to keep pace with population growth and economic development. Where is all the food going to come from?
There are two principal ways to boost food production: increasing the amount of land under cultivation or increasing yields. Until the 1960s the favored strategy was putting more land under the plough, resulting in the loss of much of the world's wilderness and native forest.
But in the 1960s plant breeders such as Norman Borlaug pioneered a new strategy, increasing crop yields through a mixture of seed improvement and technological inputs: the green revolution. As crops of the new varieties were planted, first in Mexico and then throughout the world, particularly in Asia, harvests soared and have continued to rise at a rate of about 2 percent a year.
But the green revolution is grinding to a halt. There have been only small yield increases in recent years, and it is thought that rice grown on the most productive irrigated land has now achieved maximum production levels. The challenge for the future is to increase yields in more marginal lands, where much of the crop ends up in the bellies of insects or is devastated by drought or disease.
Many scientists (including Borlaug) believe that the only way to provide food security for the world's poorest people is to genetically engineer crops that are more resistant to nature's ravages.
The potential value of GM crops was highlighted earlier this year with the publication of the results of a Chinese study that demonstrated a 10 percent increase in yield for farms that planted an insect-resistant GM variety of rice.
In quite an understatement, Jikun Huang, the director of the Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said: "The performance of insect-resistant GM rice in trials has been impressive." Not only were yields up, but the use of pesticides dropped by 80 percent and farmers reported a dramatic reduction in pesticide-related health problems.
But inserting a single gene is just tinkering. What the rice genome project provides is a blueprint of the entire genome and the capability to engineer the crop to meet the needs of farmers throughout the world.
The rice genome was sequenced by the International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, a unique collaboration of researchers in Japan, China, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, the US, Canada, France, India, Brazil, the Philippines and the UK.
The project, with its insistence on making its data immediately available to scientists anywhere in the world at no cost, is a glowing example of one of the positive benefits of globalisation: internationally collaborative science that can benefit the entire world. Even before publication, researchers had already mined the rice genome data to identify novel genes.
Of course, many aid organizations -- often heavily influenced by Western green campaigns -- have attacked the emphasis on GM technology, calling it a "technical fix" that does little to address the real social and economic causes of world poverty and hunger.
They said the same several decades ago when widespread famine was predicted to follow a population explosion. The population explosion materialized but the famine didn't. The reason was that while others argued for social reform, pioneering plant breeders launched the green revolution and saved millions from starvation. The Human Development Report 2001, commissioned by the UN development program, concluded that "many developing countries might reap great benefits from genetically modified food crops and other organisms."
Some 1.2 million people live on less than one US dollar a day, and that dollar usually buys rice. But the crop is prone to many diseases, pests and unpredictable climate change. Genetic engineering of crops to generate new varieties resistant to disease, pests, drought and salinity could revolutionize third-world farming. The release of the rice genome sequence places a powerful toolkit in the hands of researchers eager to improve crop yields.
Johnjoe McFadden is professor of molecular genetics at the University of Surrey, England, and author of Quantum Evolution.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath