The Asian economic system is now quietly undergoing an important transformation, which we can call the "transcendence of the China market." The Chinese government has gone all out to stop this by distorting economic information, even as the US has taken strategic action to boost the trend.
The flood of investment into China has slowed and many international companies have adopted a "China-plus-one" investment strategy.
Given the risk of investing in China revealed by the SARS pandemic in 2003, foreign investors from advanced nations have carried out a "China-plus-one" policy of locating their production facilities and operating headquarters in Asian nations other than China. The "China-plus-one" policy means a company should invest not only in China but also one other place. It has stimulated a fad, with foreign textile companies having sought to invest their capital in Bangladesh, Vietnam and Myanmar.
As the "China-plus-one" trend continues, it is inevitably causing foreign investment in China to slow down. According to statistics published by the Chinese government, foreign direct investment in China in the first five months of this year decreased by 0.8 percent compared with the same period last year, the first negative growth of foreign capital inflows since September 2000.
The above figure is a conservative estimate by Chinese government officials. In fact, the Chinese government deliberately made "arbitrary changes" in last year's statistical data in order to camouflage decreased foreign investment. For example, it changed the figure for March last year of US$5.75 billion of foreign direct investment from abroad to US$4.87 billion, and the April last year figure of US$5.55 billion to US$4.86 billion.
By offsetting statistical values, the Chinese government was able to claim that inward direct investment increased by 10.7 percent in January, compared to the same month last year, as well as a 5.7 percent increase in February, an 11.4 percent rise in March and a 16 percent decline in April. In short, China has lowered its baseline values to show a significant increase of foreign capital inflows.
It is hardly surprising to see the Chinese government distort information. For many years, the illusion of an "economic miracle" in China has attracted foreign investors. It conjures up an image of a Chinese economy that will undergo indefinite linear growth unaffected by regular business cycles, and that foreign investors have no choice but to invest there to maintain their competitiveness.
Despite China's propaganda ploy, it has not been able to stop the decline of foreign direct investment this year. The downturn of foreign investment clearly indicates a low evaluation of the Chinese economy by international enterprises.
Some commentators have said that Washington is improving ties with India as a way to contain China. But, the actual impact is more economic than military. Now that the US has better relations with India and worse relations with China, it will be necessary for the directors of multinational firms to include India in their strategy reports.
In sum, this is the end of China's monopoly of almost all foreign investment capital. India will soon replace it by attracting more and more foreign investors. Besides other countries such as Vietnam, where the average wage is half that in China, Indonesia, where it is under 40 percent, and Bangladesh, Myanmar and Cambodia, where it is around 30 percent, are all attracting more investment. The Chinese government understands the strategic implications of these developments. It is essential that Taiwan also take note.
Chang Hsi-mo is an associate professor of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies at National Sun Yat-sen University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS