The Asian economic system is now quietly undergoing an important transformation, which we can call the "transcendence of the China market." The Chinese government has gone all out to stop this by distorting economic information, even as the US has taken strategic action to boost the trend.
The flood of investment into China has slowed and many international companies have adopted a "China-plus-one" investment strategy.
Given the risk of investing in China revealed by the SARS pandemic in 2003, foreign investors from advanced nations have carried out a "China-plus-one" policy of locating their production facilities and operating headquarters in Asian nations other than China. The "China-plus-one" policy means a company should invest not only in China but also one other place. It has stimulated a fad, with foreign textile companies having sought to invest their capital in Bangladesh, Vietnam and Myanmar.
As the "China-plus-one" trend continues, it is inevitably causing foreign investment in China to slow down. According to statistics published by the Chinese government, foreign direct investment in China in the first five months of this year decreased by 0.8 percent compared with the same period last year, the first negative growth of foreign capital inflows since September 2000.
The above figure is a conservative estimate by Chinese government officials. In fact, the Chinese government deliberately made "arbitrary changes" in last year's statistical data in order to camouflage decreased foreign investment. For example, it changed the figure for March last year of US$5.75 billion of foreign direct investment from abroad to US$4.87 billion, and the April last year figure of US$5.55 billion to US$4.86 billion.
By offsetting statistical values, the Chinese government was able to claim that inward direct investment increased by 10.7 percent in January, compared to the same month last year, as well as a 5.7 percent increase in February, an 11.4 percent rise in March and a 16 percent decline in April. In short, China has lowered its baseline values to show a significant increase of foreign capital inflows.
It is hardly surprising to see the Chinese government distort information. For many years, the illusion of an "economic miracle" in China has attracted foreign investors. It conjures up an image of a Chinese economy that will undergo indefinite linear growth unaffected by regular business cycles, and that foreign investors have no choice but to invest there to maintain their competitiveness.
Despite China's propaganda ploy, it has not been able to stop the decline of foreign direct investment this year. The downturn of foreign investment clearly indicates a low evaluation of the Chinese economy by international enterprises.
Some commentators have said that Washington is improving ties with India as a way to contain China. But, the actual impact is more economic than military. Now that the US has better relations with India and worse relations with China, it will be necessary for the directors of multinational firms to include India in their strategy reports.
In sum, this is the end of China's monopoly of almost all foreign investment capital. India will soon replace it by attracting more and more foreign investors. Besides other countries such as Vietnam, where the average wage is half that in China, Indonesia, where it is under 40 percent, and Bangladesh, Myanmar and Cambodia, where it is around 30 percent, are all attracting more investment. The Chinese government understands the strategic implications of these developments. It is essential that Taiwan also take note.
Chang Hsi-mo is an associate professor of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies at National Sun Yat-sen University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers